Making Monsters

We reflect on how recent changes in the moral landscape of Western society that prioritize harm avoidance in all its forms have led to the emergence of victimhood culture in some organizations. We explain how this cultural development has been augmented by an expansion of the concept of harm to include psychological and emotional harms that are entirely subjective and therefore impossible to refute. Together, these conditions have affected the dynamics of workplace conflict and how managers adjudicate and resolve them. We argue that when a victimhood culture takes hold in an organization and the avoidance of subjective harm is prioritized, it can lead to the sanctification of victims and dichotomous thinking habits that create two types of metaphorical monsters. We end by offering a recommendation for how managers might avoid the epistemological and ethical bind created by this type of thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Inquiry
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926261445350
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Monsters

Brian Lutgens, Karl Aquino
Journal of Management Inquiry
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Making Monsters

Brian Lutgens, Karl Aquino
article en

Abstract

We reflect on how recent changes in the moral landscape of Western society that prioritize harm avoidance in all its forms have led to the emergence of victimhood culture in some organizations. We explain how this cultural development has been augmented by an expansion of the concept of harm to include psychological and emotional harms that are entirely subjective and therefore impossible to refute. Together, these conditions have affected the dynamics of workplace conflict and how managers adjudicate and resolve them. We argue that when a victimhood culture takes hold in an organization and the avoidance of subjective harm is prioritized, it can lead to the sanctification of victims and dichotomous thinking habits that create two types of metaphorical monsters. We end by offering a recommendation for how managers might avoid the epistemological and ethical bind created by this type of thinking.

Journal of Management Inquiry
University of British Columbia (CA), Virginia Tech (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.