Acquisition-Induced Kill Zones

We study how acquisitions by a dominant incumbent affect entry and R&D incentives in markets with multiple startups. We show that acquisitions can create a kill zone, which suppresses entry and distorts the innovation direction of nontargeted startups. The resulting reduced threat of entry may lead the incumbent to shelve the acquired technology. The kill zone effect strengthens targeted startups’ incentives to enter primarily to be bought out and makes acquisitions more attractive to the incumbent than in-house R&D. To balance kill zone distortions to innovation against the potential synergies from acquisitions, a consumer welfare–maximizing merger policy may involve blocking some, but not all, acquisitions. This paper was accepted by Anita McGahan, strategy. Funding: C. Wang thanks the Australian Research Council Discovery Project [Grant DP210102015] for the generous financial support. C. Teh thanks the European Research Council (ERC) [Grant 101088307] for the generous financial support. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.07841 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.07841
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acquisition-Induced Kill Zones

Chengsi Wang, Christopher Teh, Dyuti Banerjee
Management Science
Firm Innovation and Growth
article

Acquisition-Induced Kill Zones

Chengsi Wang, Christopher Teh, Dyuti Banerjee
article en

Abstract

We study how acquisitions by a dominant incumbent affect entry and R&D incentives in markets with multiple startups. We show that acquisitions can create a kill zone, which suppresses entry and distorts the innovation direction of nontargeted startups. The resulting reduced threat of entry may lead the incumbent to shelve the acquired technology. The kill zone effect strengthens targeted startups’ incentives to enter primarily to be bought out and makes acquisitions more attractive to the incumbent than in-house R&D. To balance kill zone distortions to innovation against the potential synergies from acquisitions, a consumer welfare–maximizing merger policy may involve blocking some, but not all, acquisitions. This paper was accepted by Anita McGahan, strategy. Funding: C. Wang thanks the Australian Research Council Discovery Project [Grant DP210102015] for the generous financial support. C. Teh thanks the European Research Council (ERC) [Grant 101088307] for the generous financial support. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.07841 .

Management Science
Toulouse School of Economics (FR), Monash University (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Firm Innovation and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Acquisition-Induced Kill Zones — Chengsi Wang, Christopher Teh, et al. · Management Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS