What is Nature? A Prototype Analysis of the Natural Environment
Given the inconsistent definitions of nature, we used a bottom-up protype approach (total N = 824) to solicit features of the natural environment (Study 1) and centrality ratings of those features (Study 2). Study 3 tested the prototype structure via ratings of scenarios composed of highly prototypical (vs. less prototypical) features. Over 100 features were generated, and features like wildlife , trees , and ecosystems were rated as most central, with features associated with people much less so. Results of Study 3 supported the protype structure with high (vs. low) prototypical scenarios rated higher in naturalness. We also explored individual differences in subjective nature connectedness; highly connected people generated more features and rated features as more prototypical. The nature protype provides a resource for researchers and practitioners to design or assess stimuli/spaces that fit people’s views of nature, and we discuss the useful scope of this prototype (e.g., across geography and identities).
Authors
- Cheryl Harasymchuk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-0035)
- John M. Zelenski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3668-5764)
- Madeline E.A. Wadlow
- Jessica E. Desrochers
- Daniel W. Shaw
Institutions
- Carleton University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Environment and Behavior
- Published
- 2026-05-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165261450676
- Primary Topic
- Urban Green Space and Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada