What is Nature? A Prototype Analysis of the Natural Environment

Given the inconsistent definitions of nature, we used a bottom-up protype approach (total N = 824) to solicit features of the natural environment (Study 1) and centrality ratings of those features (Study 2). Study 3 tested the prototype structure via ratings of scenarios composed of highly prototypical (vs. less prototypical) features. Over 100 features were generated, and features like wildlife , trees , and ecosystems were rated as most central, with features associated with people much less so. Results of Study 3 supported the protype structure with high (vs. low) prototypical scenarios rated higher in naturalness. We also explored individual differences in subjective nature connectedness; highly connected people generated more features and rated features as more prototypical. The nature protype provides a resource for researchers and practitioners to design or assess stimuli/spaces that fit people’s views of nature, and we discuss the useful scope of this prototype (e.g., across geography and identities).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Behavior
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165261450676
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is Nature? A Prototype Analysis of the Natural Environment

Cheryl Harasymchuk, John M. Zelenski, Madeline E.A. Wadlow, Jessica E. Desrochers et al.
Environment and Behavior
Urban Green Space and Health
article

What is Nature? A Prototype Analysis of the Natural Environment

Cheryl Harasymchuk, John M. Zelenski, Madeline E.A. Wadlow, Jessica E. Desrochers, Daniel W. Shaw
article en

Abstract

Given the inconsistent definitions of nature, we used a bottom-up protype approach (total N = 824) to solicit features of the natural environment (Study 1) and centrality ratings of those features (Study 2). Study 3 tested the prototype structure via ratings of scenarios composed of highly prototypical (vs. less prototypical) features. Over 100 features were generated, and features like wildlife , trees , and ecosystems were rated as most central, with features associated with people much less so. Results of Study 3 supported the protype structure with high (vs. low) prototypical scenarios rated higher in naturalness. We also explored individual differences in subjective nature connectedness; highly connected people generated more features and rated features as more prototypical. The nature protype provides a resource for researchers and practitioners to design or assess stimuli/spaces that fit people’s views of nature, and we discuss the useful scope of this prototype (e.g., across geography and identities).

Environment and Behavior
Carleton University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.