Yes, and: Leveraging peer‐led professional development support as a bridge between the status quo and senior faculty‐led efforts

Hospital medicine is a young and rapidly growing specialty. As such, most hospital medicine groups have many junior faculty with proportionately few senior faculty to support their career growth through traditional dyadic mentorship. As an alternative that may be more feasible in practice, we propose the development and expansion of peer-led efforts, in tandem with training efforts from organizations such as the Society of Hospital Medicine. In addition to logistical advantages, these approaches bring numerous benefits compared with traditional mentoring: potential for greater psychological safety and reciprocal social support, and opportunities to build career-long relationships. We believe that there are substantial opportunities for innovation and for scholarship to evaluate the impact and outcomes of peer mentorship efforts. We suggest several avenues for advancing peer mentorship within hospital medicine at the national, regional, local, and institutional levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70350
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Yes, and: Leveraging peer‐led professional development support as a bridge between the status quo and senior faculty‐led efforts

Mary Ann Kirkconnell Hall, Manpreet Malik, Annie Massart
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

Yes, and: Leveraging peer‐led professional development support as a bridge between the status quo and senior faculty‐led efforts

Mary Ann Kirkconnell Hall, Manpreet Malik, Annie Massart
article en

Abstract

Hospital medicine is a young and rapidly growing specialty. As such, most hospital medicine groups have many junior faculty with proportionately few senior faculty to support their career growth through traditional dyadic mentorship. As an alternative that may be more feasible in practice, we propose the development and expansion of peer-led efforts, in tandem with training efforts from organizations such as the Society of Hospital Medicine. In addition to logistical advantages, these approaches bring numerous benefits compared with traditional mentoring: potential for greater psychological safety and reciprocal social support, and opportunities to build career-long relationships. We believe that there are substantial opportunities for innovation and for scholarship to evaluate the impact and outcomes of peer mentorship efforts. We suggest several avenues for advancing peer mentorship within hospital medicine at the national, regional, local, and institutional levels.

Journal of Hospital Medicine
Emory University Hospital (US), Grady Health System (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.