Defining evidential support for clinical effects in occupational therapy through Bayesian calibration of the paired samples <i>t</i> -test

PURPOSE: -tests using Bayesian posterior probabilities representing evidential support for a clinical effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: . RESULTS: -values near .05 consistently failed to achieve posterior probabilities of 75% or greater. CONCLUSIONS: These recalibrated thresholds provide occupational therapists a principled, sample size-sensitive tool for interpreting within-subject outcomes probabilistically, offering a practical alternative to conventional heuristic benchmarks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2667685
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining evidential support for clinical effects in occupational therapy through Bayesian calibration of the paired samples t -test

Daniel W. Martin
Disability and Rehabilitation
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Defining evidential support for clinical effects in occupational therapy through Bayesian calibration of the paired samples t -test

Daniel W. Martin
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: -tests using Bayesian posterior probabilities representing evidential support for a clinical effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: . RESULTS: -values near .05 consistently failed to achieve posterior probabilities of 75% or greater. CONCLUSIONS: These recalibrated thresholds provide occupational therapists a principled, sample size-sensitive tool for interpreting within-subject outcomes probabilistically, offering a practical alternative to conventional heuristic benchmarks.

Disability and Rehabilitation
University of Western States (US), Precision for Medicine (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.