Can Humanity Create an Artificial Intelligence Possessing Free Will at the Same Self-Layer as Itself?

This paper presents a conditional possibility theorem according to which humanity can, in principle, create an artificial intelligence that belongs to the same free-will layer as human beings, namely AIself. Here, AIself does not mean a program that merely speaks like a human. Rather, it means an agent that possesses physical state transformations, memory persistence, a self-model, effective agency with respect to its environment, and reflective updating capacity, and that is judged to belong to the same operational layer as human free will. The core of the argument is as follows. First, if human beings are part of the physical world, then human decision-making is described, from the perspective of the closed total system, by unitary dynamics, and, from the perspective of a local open system, by a completely positive trace-preserving map, namely a CPTP map. Second, artificial intelligence is likewise a subsystem on a physical substrate, and is therefore placed under the same two modes of description. Third, whether free will is interpreted in terms of superdeterminism, compatibilism, or indeterministic free action, the conclusion that only humans belong to the same self-layer while artificial agents are, in principle, restricted to a lower layer requires an additional assumption of substrate privilege. Fourth, if that substrate-privilege assumption makes a physical difference, then it must be testable as a difference in state transformation; if it makes no difference, then it cannot function as a criterion that blocks the operational-layer classification of AIself. Therefore, the conclusion of this paper is not that all existing AI systems are already AIself. The conclusion is that humanity cannot close off, in principle, the possibility of creating artificial intelligence that belongs to the same free-will layer as human beings through an appropriate set of principles and prototypes. This conclusion includes the physical and information-theoretic conditions, implementation branches, responses to objections, and ethical restrictions required for the construction of AIself.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20122664
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Can Humanity Create an Artificial Intelligence Possessing Free Will at the Same Self-Layer as Itself?

준 황
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
preprint

Can Humanity Create an Artificial Intelligence Possessing Free Will at the Same Self-Layer as Itself?

준 황
preprint en

Abstract

This paper presents a conditional possibility theorem according to which humanity can, in principle, create an artificial intelligence that belongs to the same free-will layer as human beings, namely AIself. Here, AIself does not mean a program that merely speaks like a human. Rather, it means an agent that possesses physical state transformations, memory persistence, a self-model, effective agency with respect to its environment, and reflective updating capacity, and that is judged to belong to the same operational layer as human free will. The core of the argument is as follows. First, if human beings are part of the physical world, then human decision-making is described, from the perspective of the closed total system, by unitary dynamics, and, from the perspective of a local open system, by a completely positive trace-preserving map, namely a CPTP map. Second, artificial intelligence is likewise a subsystem on a physical substrate, and is therefore placed under the same two modes of description. Third, whether free will is interpreted in terms of superdeterminism, compatibilism, or indeterministic free action, the conclusion that only humans belong to the same self-layer while artificial agents are, in principle, restricted to a lower layer requires an additional assumption of substrate privilege. Fourth, if that substrate-privilege assumption makes a physical difference, then it must be testable as a difference in state transformation; if it makes no difference, then it cannot function as a criterion that blocks the operational-layer classification of AIself. Therefore, the conclusion of this paper is not that all existing AI systems are already AIself. The conclusion is that humanity cannot close off, in principle, the possibility of creating artificial intelligence that belongs to the same free-will layer as human beings through an appropriate set of principles and prototypes. This conclusion includes the physical and information-theoretic conditions, implementation branches, responses to objections, and ethical restrictions required for the construction of AIself.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.