Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix Versus Dienogest for Treatment of Moderate‐to‐Severe Endometriosis Pain: A Phase <scp>III</scp> , Multicentric, Double‐Blind, Active‐Controlled, Non‐Inferiority Study
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of elagolix with dienogest in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: A multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase III study. SETTING: Nineteen clinical centres across India. STUDY POPULATION: Women (18-49 years) diagnosed with endometriosis and experiencing moderate-to-severe pain. METHODS: Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive oral elagolix (150 mg once daily) or dienogest (2 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in endometriosis-related pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) from baseline to Day 85. Secondary outcomes included changes in NRS (Day 169), dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) scores (Days 85 and 169), rescue medication use, patient global impression of change (PGIC), adverse events and bone mineral density. RESULTS: Of 340 patients screened, 230 were randomised (115 per group). At Day 85, both arms showed similar reductions in NRS pain scores with a treatment difference of 0.04 (95% CI: -0.3, 0.37) [p = 0.9747] demonstrating non-inferiority as upper 95% CI was below pre-specified margin of 1.5. At Day 169, both arms showed comparable improvements in overall pain, dysmenorrhoea and NMPP from baseline (p = 0.9372, p = 0.8884, and p = 0.9616, respectively). Rescue medication use and PGIC were comparable between treatment arms. Adverse event incidence was similar (elagolix: 14.8%; dienogest: 19.1%), with no serious TEAEs or discontinuations. No significant bone mineral density changes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Elagolix demonstrated non-inferiority to dienogest with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, supporting its use in managing endometriosis-associated pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CTRI/2023/01/049292.
Authors
- Gourisankar Kamilya
- Sucheta Pandit
- Malathi Ponnuru
- Deepa Choudhary
- M. C. Rangaswamy
- Mrinal Kanti Dash
- Sneha Bhoir
- Neena Gupta
- Piyush Patel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-8332)
- Sweety Saigal
- Tanusree Gupta
- Dipak Patil
- Suyog Mehta
- Lalit Lakhwani
- Sadhana Joglekar
- Shruti Saha
- Parul Shah
- Kartikbhai Savalia
- Shalini Srivastava
- Tushar Palve
- Apurva Shetty
- Jaldhara Patel
- Pravin Ghadge
- Vidya V Bhatt
- Reshma Quadros
Institutions
- SMS Medical College (IN)
- Government of Andhra Pradesh (IN)
- Cama and Albless Hospital (IN)
- Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College (IN)
- Mediciti Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
- Midas Multispeciality Hospital (IN)
- Indian Institute of Advanced Research (IN)
- M.V. Hospital and Research Centre (IN)
- Sparsh Hospital (IN)
- Krishna Maternity and Surgical Nursing Home (IN)
- Sun Pharma (India) (IN)
- Sun Pharma Advanced Research (India) (IN)
- VIR Biotechnology (United States) (US)
- Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
- Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College (IN)
- Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Published
- 2026-05-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.70256
- Primary Topic
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Sun Pharma