Representations of Nonlocal Syntactic Dependencies Feed Verb Learning in Infancy

The ability to represent both local and nonlocal syntactic dependencies emerges in an infant's second year of life, raising questions about how these early syntactic representations interact with language learning in other domains. Using wh-questions as our case study, we investigate how infants' syntactic dependency acquisition interacts with their early lexical development. Prior work finds that 18-month-olds represent fronted wh-phrases as nonlocal arguments in object wh-questions with known verbs. Here, we show that 19-21-month-olds (range: 18;29-21;26) do the same when interpreting unknown verbs. We introduce a novel Violation of Fit method, a cross-modal extension of the Violation of Expectations paradigm. Infants saw dialogues with novel verbs in object wh-questions (e.g., What is the girl gonna gorp?), transitive polar questions (Is the girl gonna gorp the toy?), or intransitive polar questions (Is the girl gonna gorp?). At test, infants viewed a causal event (e.g., a girl knocks over a tower), and we measured their attention as an indication of whether they considered the verbs to be a good fit for this type of event. Across the age range, we found that infants who heard wh-question dialogues attended similarly to the test events as infants who heard canonical transitive dialogues, and unlike infants who heard intransitive dialogues. Thus, 19-21-month-olds treat object wh-questions with a novel verb as transitive when relating them to scenes. This suggests that immediately after wh-dependency representations are first acquired, they are available to feed verb learning. SUMMARY: We find that 19-21-month-olds represent wh-phrases (e.g., what) as nonlocal objects in wh-questions with unknown verbs (e.g., What is the girl gonna gorp?). We introduce a novel experimental paradigm, Violation of Fit, which measures how well an infant considers a particular sentence to fit with a particular scene. This test reveals that infants treat object wh-questions with a novel verb as transitive, and therefore a good fit to a causal event. This suggests that immediately after wh-dependency representations are first acquired, they are available to feed verb learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Science
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70207
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representations of Nonlocal Syntactic Dependencies Feed Verb Learning in Infancy

Laurel Perkins, Yuanfan Ying, Alexander Williams, Jeffrey Lidz
Developmental Science
Language Development and Disorders
article

Representations of Nonlocal Syntactic Dependencies Feed Verb Learning in Infancy

Laurel Perkins, Yuanfan Ying, Alexander Williams, Jeffrey Lidz
article en

Abstract

The ability to represent both local and nonlocal syntactic dependencies emerges in an infant's second year of life, raising questions about how these early syntactic representations interact with language learning in other domains. Using wh-questions as our case study, we investigate how infants' syntactic dependency acquisition interacts with their early lexical development. Prior work finds that 18-month-olds represent fronted wh-phrases as nonlocal arguments in object wh-questions with known verbs. Here, we show that 19-21-month-olds (range: 18;29-21;26) do the same when interpreting unknown verbs. We introduce a novel Violation of Fit method, a cross-modal extension of the Violation of Expectations paradigm. Infants saw dialogues with novel verbs in object wh-questions (e.g., What is the girl gonna gorp?), transitive polar questions (Is the girl gonna gorp the toy?), or intransitive polar questions (Is the girl gonna gorp?). At test, infants viewed a causal event (e.g., a girl knocks over a tower), and we measured their attention as an indication of whether they considered the verbs to be a good fit for this type of event. Across the age range, we found that infants who heard wh-question dialogues attended similarly to the test events as infants who heard canonical transitive dialogues, and unlike infants who heard intransitive dialogues. Thus, 19-21-month-olds treat object wh-questions with a novel verb as transitive when relating them to scenes. This suggests that immediately after wh-dependency representations are first acquired, they are available to feed verb learning. SUMMARY: We find that 19-21-month-olds represent wh-phrases (e.g., what) as nonlocal objects in wh-questions with unknown verbs (e.g., What is the girl gonna gorp?). We introduce a novel experimental paradigm, Violation of Fit, which measures how well an infant considers a particular sentence to fit with a particular scene. This test reveals that infants treat object wh-questions with a novel verb as transitive, and therefore a good fit to a causal event. This suggests that immediately after wh-dependency representations are first acquired, they are available to feed verb learning.

Developmental ScienceVol. 29(4)
Center for Applied Linguistics (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Dongguk University Los Angeles (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.