Damage Quantification in Exclusionary Abuse Cases

The last decade has witnessed a changing scene of exclusionary abuse cases. As a result, competition authorities around the globe are now investigating new forms of exclusionary abuse in fast-evolving markets. These changes inevitably affect our understanding of the harm caused by exclusionary conduct and how redress is sought. Although there are many academic and practitioner papers on estimating damages in cartel and excessive pricing cases, they have limited applicability to exclusionary cases. This paper provides an overview of the main considerations that should apply in damage quantification in exclusionary abuse cases. We do this by giving a detailed account of the main characteristics of damage claims in these cases, reviewing the theories of harm and, building on these theories, discussing possible counterfactuals and methods for estimating the magnitude of harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Antitrust Bulletin
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x261443672
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Damage Quantification in Exclusionary Abuse Cases

Joe Perkins, Peter L. Ormosi, Jorge Padilla
The Antitrust Bulletin
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Damage Quantification in Exclusionary Abuse Cases

Joe Perkins, Peter L. Ormosi, Jorge Padilla
article en

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed a changing scene of exclusionary abuse cases. As a result, competition authorities around the globe are now investigating new forms of exclusionary abuse in fast-evolving markets. These changes inevitably affect our understanding of the harm caused by exclusionary conduct and how redress is sought. Although there are many academic and practitioner papers on estimating damages in cartel and excessive pricing cases, they have limited applicability to exclusionary cases. This paper provides an overview of the main considerations that should apply in damage quantification in exclusionary abuse cases. We do this by giving a detailed account of the main characteristics of damage claims in these cases, reviewing the theories of harm and, building on these theories, discussing possible counterfactuals and methods for estimating the magnitude of harm.

The Antitrust Bulletin
University of East Anglia (GB), Lexmark (United States) (US), PA Consulting Group (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Damage Quantification in Exclusionary Abuse Cases — Joe Perkins, Peter L. Ormosi, et al. · The Antitrust Bulletin (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS