Owner-Reported Cohort Study of Causes, Management and Outcome of Traumatic Wounds in 219 Horses

Current evidence on traumatic equine wounds are predominantly from expert opinion reviews or referral hospital studies. This study aimed to describe the owner-reported causes, management and outcome of equine wounds. An owner-reported cohort approach was used. Owners of horses with recent traumatic wounds were recruited through snowball sampling. Data were collected from initial injury to final healing and outcome, including horse demographics, wound cause and location, owner- and veterinary-administered treatment, and outcome. Descriptive statistics included frequency percentages (%, x/y) and median and interquartile range. Data were obtained for 219 cases, with outcome data for 139 horses. The most common wound cause was a wire/fence injury (38%, 84/219), and the most common location was distal hindlimb (31%, 79/251). Owners administered initial first aid in 67% (147/219) of cases, and 75% (165/219) of horses received veterinary treatment. A total of 19% (38/201) of owners were not confident in deciding whether veterinary attention was needed. Wound healing time was a median of 60 days (IQR 30.3–157.0), time to return to work was a median of 6.5 weeks (IQR 2.0–16.0), and 3/139 horses were euthanised. Main study limitations were small sample size, self-selection, owner-reporting and attrition bias. Key areas for future resources to support owner preventative care and decision-making were identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16101474
Primary Topic
Veterinary Equine Medical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Owner-Reported Cohort Study of Causes, Management and Outcome of Traumatic Wounds in 219 Horses

Emmeline Hannelly, Gary England, J. Dubuc, Katie Burrell et al.
Animals
Veterinary Equine Medical Research
article

Owner-Reported Cohort Study of Causes, Management and Outcome of Traumatic Wounds in 219 Horses

Emmeline Hannelly, Gary England, J. Dubuc, Katie Burrell, John H. Burford, Richard Birnie, Sarah L. Freeman
article en

Abstract

Current evidence on traumatic equine wounds are predominantly from expert opinion reviews or referral hospital studies. This study aimed to describe the owner-reported causes, management and outcome of equine wounds. An owner-reported cohort approach was used. Owners of horses with recent traumatic wounds were recruited through snowball sampling. Data were collected from initial injury to final healing and outcome, including horse demographics, wound cause and location, owner- and veterinary-administered treatment, and outcome. Descriptive statistics included frequency percentages (%, x/y) and median and interquartile range. Data were obtained for 219 cases, with outcome data for 139 horses. The most common wound cause was a wire/fence injury (38%, 84/219), and the most common location was distal hindlimb (31%, 79/251). Owners administered initial first aid in 67% (147/219) of cases, and 75% (165/219) of horses received veterinary treatment. A total of 19% (38/201) of owners were not confident in deciding whether veterinary attention was needed. Wound healing time was a median of 60 days (IQR 30.3–157.0), time to return to work was a median of 6.5 weeks (IQR 2.0–16.0), and 3/139 horses were euthanised. Main study limitations were small sample size, self-selection, owner-reporting and attrition bias. Key areas for future resources to support owner preventative care and decision-making were identified.

AnimalsVol. 16(10)
University of Nottingham (GB), Loughborough University (GB), Oaks Hospital (GB), British Cardiovascular Society (GB)
University of Nottingham
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Veterinary Equine Medical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.