How Long are Five Years? Maintaining Anti-dumping Duties After Sunset Reviews

This article examines the issue of when the five-year period of reimposition of an anti-dumping duty commences after a sunset review. The article analyses the practices of all twenty-one jurisdictions that have imposed more than fifty anti-dumping duties and finds that most of these jurisdictions extend measures with effect from the finalization of the sunset review, which means that measures remain in place for more than five years. The author then analyses the words of Article 11.3 and find that duties ‘shall’ be terminated no later than five years from imposition. It provides for an exception, stating that the duty may remain in force ‘pending’ the outcome of the review. However, the choice of words suggests that if it is found that the conditions are met for extending a duty, the extension must take place from the date the duty would have lapsed but for the sunset review, and if it were not extended, it would have to lapse within five years from original imposition or last extension. The impact of this finding is that most anti-dumping duties currently in force in the world are in violation of the Anti-Dumping Agreement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2026032
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Long are Five Years? Maintaining Anti-dumping Duties After Sunset Reviews

Gustav Brink
Global Trade and Customs Journal
World Trade Organization Law
article

How Long are Five Years? Maintaining Anti-dumping Duties After Sunset Reviews

Gustav Brink
article en

Abstract

This article examines the issue of when the five-year period of reimposition of an anti-dumping duty commences after a sunset review. The article analyses the practices of all twenty-one jurisdictions that have imposed more than fifty anti-dumping duties and finds that most of these jurisdictions extend measures with effect from the finalization of the sunset review, which means that measures remain in place for more than five years. The author then analyses the words of Article 11.3 and find that duties ‘shall’ be terminated no later than five years from imposition. It provides for an exception, stating that the duty may remain in force ‘pending’ the outcome of the review. However, the choice of words suggests that if it is found that the conditions are met for extending a duty, the extension must take place from the date the duty would have lapsed but for the sunset review, and if it were not extended, it would have to lapse within five years from original imposition or last extension. The impact of this finding is that most anti-dumping duties currently in force in the world are in violation of the Anti-Dumping Agreement.

Global Trade and Customs JournalVol. 21(Issue 5)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Long are Five Years? Maintaining Anti-dumping Duties After Sunset Reviews — Gustav Brink · Global Trade and Customs Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS