Systematic review and meta-analysis on the beneficial effect of exercise on sexual dysfunction in women

Abstract Background Sexual dysfunction is a condition that affects more than 43% of women worldwide, with a multifactorial aetiology and whose diagnosis and treatment are often poorly studied in women. Aim The present systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise compared with non-intervention control groups (CG) on women’s sexual dysfunction. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until August 2025. Controlled trials in adult women comparing exercise/physical activity (PA) with usual care controls were included if sexual function was assessed using validated questionnaires. Interventions (≥4 weeks) comprised pelvic-floor, aerobic, resistance, combined, yoga, aquatic, or core programs. English-language, peer-reviewed studies were included; those lacking controls, post-intervention data, validated measures, or appropriate design were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified PEDro scale, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, considering risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. Meta-analysis was restricted to Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) outcomes; other measures were narratively synthesized. Results Twenty-three studies were included in the systematic review. Eighteen studies reported significant differences between experimental and CG, and 20 showed improvements in sexual function following exercise intervention. FSFI. Meta-analysis of 15 studies using the FSFI demonstrated significant benefits versus controls (mean difference: 5.31 points; 95% CI, 4.87–5.75), with improvements across all subdomains (range 0.59–0.96 points). Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 76%–94%). Study quality was predominantly good to excellent, although overall certainty of evidence was rated as low due to heterogeneity. Conclusion A wide range of exercise interventions positively impacted women’s sexual function, improving domains including desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and dyspareunia. These findings support the role of PA in enhancing both overall health and sexual wellbeing in women. Trial Registration PROSPERO (CRD42023492467).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdag128
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the beneficial effect of exercise on sexual dysfunction in women

Maitane Ruiz-Rios, Sara Maldonado‐Martín, Sara Cuesta-Ibáñez, Iñaki Ruiz-Pérez
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the beneficial effect of exercise on sexual dysfunction in women

Maitane Ruiz-Rios, Sara Maldonado‐Martín, Sara Cuesta-Ibáñez, Iñaki Ruiz-Pérez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Sexual dysfunction is a condition that affects more than 43% of women worldwide, with a multifactorial aetiology and whose diagnosis and treatment are often poorly studied in women. Aim The present systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise compared with non-intervention control groups (CG) on women’s sexual dysfunction. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until August 2025. Controlled trials in adult women comparing exercise/physical activity (PA) with usual care controls were included if sexual function was assessed using validated questionnaires. Interventions (≥4 weeks) comprised pelvic-floor, aerobic, resistance, combined, yoga, aquatic, or core programs. English-language, peer-reviewed studies were included; those lacking controls, post-intervention data, validated measures, or appropriate design were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified PEDro scale, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, considering risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. Meta-analysis was restricted to Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) outcomes; other measures were narratively synthesized. Results Twenty-three studies were included in the systematic review. Eighteen studies reported significant differences between experimental and CG, and 20 showed improvements in sexual function following exercise intervention. FSFI. Meta-analysis of 15 studies using the FSFI demonstrated significant benefits versus controls (mean difference: 5.31 points; 95% CI, 4.87–5.75), with improvements across all subdomains (range 0.59–0.96 points). Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 76%–94%). Study quality was predominantly good to excellent, although overall certainty of evidence was rated as low due to heterogeneity. Conclusion A wide range of exercise interventions positively impacted women’s sexual function, improving domains including desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and dyspareunia. These findings support the role of PA in enhancing both overall health and sexual wellbeing in women. Trial Registration PROSPERO (CRD42023492467).

The Journal of Sexual MedicineVol. 23(6)
Ikerbasque (ES), University of the Basque Country (ES), Basque Government (ES), Department of Education (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.