Service Performance Monitoring in Thoracic Surgery: Application of Statistical Process Control to a State‐Wide Registry

OBJECTIVE: Statistical Process Control methods have proven effective in enhancing outcomes monitoring and improvement within various clinical domains. This study investigates their application in supporting thoracic surgical quality assurance processes across public hospitals in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of clinical data from thoracic surgeries performed at five public hospitals between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2023, was conducted. Performance benchmarks were developed and assessed. Exponentially Weighted Moving Average charts and Funnel Plots were utilised for analysis and reporting. To account for common cause variation, Risk Adjustment models were developed and incorporated into the monitoring process. RESULTS: Outcome indicators of service quality throughout patient care were examined. Clinical outcome indicators identified as being suitable quality markers included: Death within 90 days, Major Acute Morbidity, Return to Theatre, Length of Stay, Readmission within 30 days and Tumour/Node/Metastasis (TNM) Up/Down Staging. SPC tools revealed patterns of variation over time and between sites, prompting investigation into contributing factors and opportunities for quality improvement projects. While the primary goal is to efficiently and effectively identify instances of underperformance, a structured approach to signal investigation can be used to initiate quality improvement projects when sustained performance is identified that is better than expected. CONCLUSIONS: SPC tools effectively facilitate clinical performance monitoring, aiding in timely detection and intervention in instances of altered performance. Careful interpretation of performance charts assists in identifying both declines and positive experiences, fostering continuous learning and improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70671
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Service Performance Monitoring in Thoracic Surgery: Application of Statistical Process Control to a State‐Wide Registry

Marcus Prior, Shantel Chang, Andrie Stroebel, M. Mallouhi et al.
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
article

Service Performance Monitoring in Thoracic Surgery: Application of Statistical Process Control to a State‐Wide Registry

Marcus Prior, Shantel Chang, Andrie Stroebel, M. Mallouhi, Manish Mathew, C. Cole, W. Vollbon, Morgan Windsor, Ian R. Smith, Anil Prabhu, Rishendran Naidoo
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Statistical Process Control methods have proven effective in enhancing outcomes monitoring and improvement within various clinical domains. This study investigates their application in supporting thoracic surgical quality assurance processes across public hospitals in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of clinical data from thoracic surgeries performed at five public hospitals between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2023, was conducted. Performance benchmarks were developed and assessed. Exponentially Weighted Moving Average charts and Funnel Plots were utilised for analysis and reporting. To account for common cause variation, Risk Adjustment models were developed and incorporated into the monitoring process. RESULTS: Outcome indicators of service quality throughout patient care were examined. Clinical outcome indicators identified as being suitable quality markers included: Death within 90 days, Major Acute Morbidity, Return to Theatre, Length of Stay, Readmission within 30 days and Tumour/Node/Metastasis (TNM) Up/Down Staging. SPC tools revealed patterns of variation over time and between sites, prompting investigation into contributing factors and opportunities for quality improvement projects. While the primary goal is to efficiently and effectively identify instances of underperformance, a structured approach to signal investigation can be used to initiate quality improvement projects when sustained performance is identified that is better than expected. CONCLUSIONS: SPC tools effectively facilitate clinical performance monitoring, aiding in timely detection and intervention in instances of altered performance. Careful interpretation of performance charts assists in identifying both declines and positive experiences, fostering continuous learning and improvement.

ANZ Journal of Surgery
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), Townsville Hospital (AU), Queensland Government (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Prince Charles Hospital (AU), St Andrew’s Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.