Temporal network analysis in systems biology: concepts, inference, and validation

While network science provides a powerful framework for deciphering complex biological systems, static models often fail to capture the dynamic nature of cellular processes. Temporal network analysis addresses this by modelling biological relationships as time-indexed graphs, offering a more realistic representation of evolving biological interactions. But, biological data are often sparse, noisy, and heterogeneous, making temporal network reconstruction highly sensitive to modelling and preprocessing choices. This review synthesises temporal network analysis for systems biology with an emphasis on practical interpretability and trustworthy inference. We highlight how different notions of “time” (e.g., longitudinal measurements, condition/stage progression, or inferred trajectories) and different meanings of “edges” (e.g., physical interactions, statistical associations, or model-based influences) support different biological claims and therefore demand different validation strategies. Using a multi-scale perspective, we survey approaches for characterising local dynamics, tracking mesoscale reorganisation such as module and community changes, and quantifying global shifts in network topology, alongside common tasks including rewiring detection, network comparison, and community evolution. A central message is that inference is often the bottleneck, while prediction is the temptation. We therefore foreground validation and benchmarking practices needed to distinguish genuine biological dynamics from artefacts of sampling, windowing, or model class. Finally, we discuss temporal graph learning, including temporal graph neural networks. We highlight when these methods can enable meaningful forecasting in biology, and when performance is inflated by sensitivity to network construction choices or information leakage in evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2026.1822526
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal network analysis in systems biology: concepts, inference, and validation

Abir Khazaal, Fatemeh Vafaee
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
article

Temporal network analysis in systems biology: concepts, inference, and validation

Abir Khazaal, Fatemeh Vafaee
article en

Abstract

While network science provides a powerful framework for deciphering complex biological systems, static models often fail to capture the dynamic nature of cellular processes. Temporal network analysis addresses this by modelling biological relationships as time-indexed graphs, offering a more realistic representation of evolving biological interactions. But, biological data are often sparse, noisy, and heterogeneous, making temporal network reconstruction highly sensitive to modelling and preprocessing choices. This review synthesises temporal network analysis for systems biology with an emphasis on practical interpretability and trustworthy inference. We highlight how different notions of “time” (e.g., longitudinal measurements, condition/stage progression, or inferred trajectories) and different meanings of “edges” (e.g., physical interactions, statistical associations, or model-based influences) support different biological claims and therefore demand different validation strategies. Using a multi-scale perspective, we survey approaches for characterising local dynamics, tracking mesoscale reorganisation such as module and community changes, and quantifying global shifts in network topology, alongside common tasks including rewiring detection, network comparison, and community evolution. A central message is that inference is often the bottleneck, while prediction is the temptation. We therefore foreground validation and benchmarking practices needed to distinguish genuine biological dynamics from artefacts of sampling, windowing, or model class. Finally, we discuss temporal graph learning, including temporal graph neural networks. We highlight when these methods can enable meaningful forecasting in biology, and when performance is inflated by sensitivity to network construction choices or information leakage in evaluation.

Frontiers in BioinformaticsVol. 6
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.