Older adults’ perspectives on big data use in hip fracture research: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Big data approaches are increasingly applied to hip fracture research, linking clinical, imaging, environmental and genomic data. Yet the views of older adults, whose data underpin these efforts, remain under-explored. METHODS: Focused, semi-structured interviews were conducted with older adults recruited from an orthopaedic ward at an inner city teaching hospital. Eligibility included age 60 years or older and a hip fracture within the previous three months. Fifteen participants took part. Interviews were audio recorded at the bedside, transcribed verbatim, anonymised and analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants commonly reported limited familiarity with the term big data yet expressed broad support for its use in healthcare. Five themes described their perspectives: limited understanding alongside support for healthcare use; consent and trust as the moral foundation for sharing; altruism and social benefit; preference for treatment and recovery over prevention; and the importance of communication, comprehension and inclusion, including clear feedback and recognition of the digital divide. Hospitals and universities were the most trusted custodians. Governments and private companies elicited scepticism. Many viewed fractures as inevitable, which dampened enthusiasm for preventive analytics, while tangible improvements to treatment and coordination were strongly valued. CONCLUSION: There is clear acceptance of big data use amongst older adults with many perceived benefits. They prioritise trust, clear consent processes, visible public benefit and opportunities for feedback. Framing data initiatives around improving patient recovery and coordination of care, as well as communicating how fracture prevention supports independence, may strengthen social license. Ethical stewardship, transparency and co-design with older adults are essential to sustain confidence and ensure data-driven innovation delivers meaningful benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-07618-0
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Older adults’ perspectives on big data use in hip fracture research: a qualitative study

Su-Lee Xiao, Michael B. Fertleman, Benjamin H. L. Harris, Louis J. Koizia
BMC Geriatrics
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Older adults’ perspectives on big data use in hip fracture research: a qualitative study

Su-Lee Xiao, Michael B. Fertleman, Benjamin H. L. Harris, Louis J. Koizia
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Big data approaches are increasingly applied to hip fracture research, linking clinical, imaging, environmental and genomic data. Yet the views of older adults, whose data underpin these efforts, remain under-explored. METHODS: Focused, semi-structured interviews were conducted with older adults recruited from an orthopaedic ward at an inner city teaching hospital. Eligibility included age 60 years or older and a hip fracture within the previous three months. Fifteen participants took part. Interviews were audio recorded at the bedside, transcribed verbatim, anonymised and analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants commonly reported limited familiarity with the term big data yet expressed broad support for its use in healthcare. Five themes described their perspectives: limited understanding alongside support for healthcare use; consent and trust as the moral foundation for sharing; altruism and social benefit; preference for treatment and recovery over prevention; and the importance of communication, comprehension and inclusion, including clear feedback and recognition of the digital divide. Hospitals and universities were the most trusted custodians. Governments and private companies elicited scepticism. Many viewed fractures as inevitable, which dampened enthusiasm for preventive analytics, while tangible improvements to treatment and coordination were strongly valued. CONCLUSION: There is clear acceptance of big data use amongst older adults with many perceived benefits. They prioritise trust, clear consent processes, visible public benefit and opportunities for feedback. Framing data initiatives around improving patient recovery and coordination of care, as well as communicating how fracture prevention supports independence, may strengthen social license. Ethical stewardship, transparency and co-design with older adults are essential to sustain confidence and ensure data-driven innovation delivers meaningful benefit.

BMC Geriatrics
St. Catherine University (US), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Medical University of Lodz (PL), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.