Controlled Agentic AI Systems: A Governance-Driven Architecture for Auditable and Reproducible Decision Pipelines

Artificial intelligence systems deployed in safety-critical and regulated environments require not only predictive performance, but also strict adherence to operational constraints, auditability, and reproducibility. However, in most contemporary architectures, governance is treated as an external or post hoc mechanism, limiting the ability to ensure consistent and verifiable decision execution. This paper introduces Controlled Agentic AI Systems (CAIS), a formal architectural framework in which governance is embedded directly into the decision pipeline as a deterministic operator. The proposed formulation integrates a decision model, a constraint specification, and a governance operator that transforms proposed actions into admissible executed actions. The framework further defines audit trace semantics and replayability conditions, enabling deterministic reconstruction of decision trajectories. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that, under standard regularity assumptions, governance can be modeled as a non-expansive projection that enforces constraint-aware decision transformation while inducing bounded decision drift. This provides formal guarantees that governance does not destabilize system dynamics under perturbations. To evaluate these properties, we implement a reference CAIS architecture and conduct controlled experiments in multi-agent and federated simulation environments. The results show that embedding governance significantly reduces the frequency and severity of constraint violations across a range of scenarios. Projection-based repair consistently outperforms approval-only strategies, achieving near-complete compliance in structured regimes while maintaining bounded intervention costs. Importantly, governance does not degrade stability or convergence in federated settings and, in some cases, reduces action-level variance induced by distributed training. While strict feasibility cannot be guaranteed in all practical settings due to approximation and solver limitations, the empirical findings confirm that governance acts as a stabilizing transformation that consistently improves compliance without introducing destabilizing effects. The CAIS framework establishes governance as a first-class architectural component of agentic AI systems, providing a unified foundation for designing constraint-aware, auditable, and reproducible decision pipelines in regulated environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/make8050125
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Controlled Agentic AI Systems: A Governance-Driven Architecture for Auditable and Reproducible Decision Pipelines

Tymoteusz Miller
Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Controlled Agentic AI Systems: A Governance-Driven Architecture for Auditable and Reproducible Decision Pipelines

Tymoteusz Miller
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence systems deployed in safety-critical and regulated environments require not only predictive performance, but also strict adherence to operational constraints, auditability, and reproducibility. However, in most contemporary architectures, governance is treated as an external or post hoc mechanism, limiting the ability to ensure consistent and verifiable decision execution. This paper introduces Controlled Agentic AI Systems (CAIS), a formal architectural framework in which governance is embedded directly into the decision pipeline as a deterministic operator. The proposed formulation integrates a decision model, a constraint specification, and a governance operator that transforms proposed actions into admissible executed actions. The framework further defines audit trace semantics and replayability conditions, enabling deterministic reconstruction of decision trajectories. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that, under standard regularity assumptions, governance can be modeled as a non-expansive projection that enforces constraint-aware decision transformation while inducing bounded decision drift. This provides formal guarantees that governance does not destabilize system dynamics under perturbations. To evaluate these properties, we implement a reference CAIS architecture and conduct controlled experiments in multi-agent and federated simulation environments. The results show that embedding governance significantly reduces the frequency and severity of constraint violations across a range of scenarios. Projection-based repair consistently outperforms approval-only strategies, achieving near-complete compliance in structured regimes while maintaining bounded intervention costs. Importantly, governance does not degrade stability or convergence in federated settings and, in some cases, reduces action-level variance induced by distributed training. While strict feasibility cannot be guaranteed in all practical settings due to approximation and solver limitations, the empirical findings confirm that governance acts as a stabilizing transformation that consistently improves compliance without introducing destabilizing effects. The CAIS framework establishes governance as a first-class architectural component of agentic AI systems, providing a unified foundation for designing constraint-aware, auditable, and reproducible decision pipelines in regulated environments.

Machine Learning and Knowledge ExtractionVol. 8(5)
University of Szczecin (PL), INTI International University (MY)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.