Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technologies, Applications, and Regulatory Frameworks: A Scoping Review

The rapid proliferation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in civilian sectors has generated diverse research spanning platform engineering, application deployment, and regulatory governance. This scoping review systematically maps the current knowledge landscape of civilian UAVs, their applications, and their regulatory frameworks, and aims to serve as initial practical guidance for researchers and practitioners initiating drone-based projects. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a structured three-stream literature search was conducted using Google Scholar, yielding 109 sources published between 2015 and 2025. This review synthesises findings across three domains: (1) technical specifications, including UAV platform configurations, their common applications, their advantages and limitations, electromechanical systems, flight control architectures, and communication technologies, while also providing key guidance on how to choose the appropriate components for a given application; (2) civil applications across eight sectors—delivery logistics, infrastructure inspection, precision agriculture, environmental monitoring, emergency response, waste management, and commercial uses—to provide inspiration as well as to capture important details on drone projects; and (3) regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations governing UAV operations. Analysis reveals concentrated research attention on autonomy and AI-driven control systems and emerging focus on communication infrastructure. Geographic representation is dominated by US, European, and Chinese contexts, with limited coverage of developing regions. Key knowledge gaps include economic feasibility analyses, standardisation frameworks, developing-world deployment contexts, and environmental lifecycle assessments. Contradictions emerge between optimistic application scalability claims and fundamental constraints in energy storage, swarm communication reliability, and privacy–efficiency trade-offs. This review provides researchers and practitioners with a comprehensive map of current UAV knowledge, identifies critical research gaps, and establishes a foundation for future research in civilian drone technologies. This study aims to systematically consolidate and synthesise fragmented research on civilian UAV technologies, applications, and regulatory frameworks into a unified reference for research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drones
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10050365
Primary Topic
UAV Applications and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technologies, Applications, and Regulatory Frameworks: A Scoping Review

Muhammad Mbarak, Mohd Hasanul Alam, Mohammed Awad
Drones
UAV Applications and Optimization
article

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technologies, Applications, and Regulatory Frameworks: A Scoping Review

Muhammad Mbarak, Mohd Hasanul Alam, Mohammed Awad
article en

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in civilian sectors has generated diverse research spanning platform engineering, application deployment, and regulatory governance. This scoping review systematically maps the current knowledge landscape of civilian UAVs, their applications, and their regulatory frameworks, and aims to serve as initial practical guidance for researchers and practitioners initiating drone-based projects. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a structured three-stream literature search was conducted using Google Scholar, yielding 109 sources published between 2015 and 2025. This review synthesises findings across three domains: (1) technical specifications, including UAV platform configurations, their common applications, their advantages and limitations, electromechanical systems, flight control architectures, and communication technologies, while also providing key guidance on how to choose the appropriate components for a given application; (2) civil applications across eight sectors—delivery logistics, infrastructure inspection, precision agriculture, environmental monitoring, emergency response, waste management, and commercial uses—to provide inspiration as well as to capture important details on drone projects; and (3) regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations governing UAV operations. Analysis reveals concentrated research attention on autonomy and AI-driven control systems and emerging focus on communication infrastructure. Geographic representation is dominated by US, European, and Chinese contexts, with limited coverage of developing regions. Key knowledge gaps include economic feasibility analyses, standardisation frameworks, developing-world deployment contexts, and environmental lifecycle assessments. Contradictions emerge between optimistic application scalability claims and fundamental constraints in energy storage, swarm communication reliability, and privacy–efficiency trade-offs. This review provides researchers and practitioners with a comprehensive map of current UAV knowledge, identifies critical research gaps, and establishes a foundation for future research in civilian drone technologies. This study aims to systematically consolidate and synthesise fragmented research on civilian UAV technologies, applications, and regulatory frameworks into a unified reference for research and practice.

DronesVol. 10(5)
American University of Ras Al Khaimah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
UAV Applications and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.