“Just the way we always did it”: ophthalmologist perspectives on changing routine anesthesia care for cataract surgery in the United States

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is one of the most common elective outpatient surgeries performed among older adults in the United States. Modern surgical technique makes cataract surgery a relatively quick, low-risk, minimally invasive outpatient procedure that can be performed solely under ophthalmologist-directed local or topical anesthesia. However, in the US, the procedure is routinely performed with additional monitoring and intravenous sedation administered by anesthesia-trained personnel. Given the procedure's safety profile, we sought to characterize ophthalmologists' perspectives on barriers preventing the adoption of more individualized approaches to cataract surgery sedation that do not automatically default to employing routine anesthesia care. METHODS: This study was conducted between December 2022 to January 2024. Using a semi-structured interview guide developed with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework, we completed interviews with ophthalmologists who performed cataract surgery with or without anesthesia care in hospital outpatient departments, ambulatory surgery centers, minor procedure rooms, and/or office-based surgery suites across the United States. Data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach to uncover descriptive themes. RESULTS: We interviewed 19 ophthalmologists (5 women), including 6 who had experience routinely performing cataract surgery without anesthesia care. Three major themes emerged: (1) inertia, defined as the tendency to continue established practices that serve to maintain the status quo, (2) financial considerations, and (3) the interdependent relationship between ophthalmology and anesthesiology. While some participants supported a more selective approach to the use of anesthesia services, study participants identified multiple barriers to change, including difficulty overcoming the current inertia, decreased reimbursement for office-based surgery, and concerns about implications for patient safety without routine anesthesia involvement. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmologists identified multiple barriers to changing current anesthesia-led sedation models for cataract surgery. Our findings can help inform future efforts to better align anesthesia care with patient and procedural needs in an aging US population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perioperative Medicine
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-026-00697-y
Primary Topic
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Just the way we always did it”: ophthalmologist perspectives on changing routine anesthesia care for cataract surgery in the United States

Saras Ramanathan, Catherine L. Chen, Nora Lyang, Daniel Dohan et al.
Perioperative Medicine
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
article

“Just the way we always did it”: ophthalmologist perspectives on changing routine anesthesia care for cataract surgery in the United States

Saras Ramanathan, Catherine L. Chen, Nora Lyang, Daniel Dohan, Neeti Parikh, Rachel Schwartz, Meghan Lane-Fall
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is one of the most common elective outpatient surgeries performed among older adults in the United States. Modern surgical technique makes cataract surgery a relatively quick, low-risk, minimally invasive outpatient procedure that can be performed solely under ophthalmologist-directed local or topical anesthesia. However, in the US, the procedure is routinely performed with additional monitoring and intravenous sedation administered by anesthesia-trained personnel. Given the procedure's safety profile, we sought to characterize ophthalmologists' perspectives on barriers preventing the adoption of more individualized approaches to cataract surgery sedation that do not automatically default to employing routine anesthesia care. METHODS: This study was conducted between December 2022 to January 2024. Using a semi-structured interview guide developed with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework, we completed interviews with ophthalmologists who performed cataract surgery with or without anesthesia care in hospital outpatient departments, ambulatory surgery centers, minor procedure rooms, and/or office-based surgery suites across the United States. Data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach to uncover descriptive themes. RESULTS: We interviewed 19 ophthalmologists (5 women), including 6 who had experience routinely performing cataract surgery without anesthesia care. Three major themes emerged: (1) inertia, defined as the tendency to continue established practices that serve to maintain the status quo, (2) financial considerations, and (3) the interdependent relationship between ophthalmology and anesthesiology. While some participants supported a more selective approach to the use of anesthesia services, study participants identified multiple barriers to change, including difficulty overcoming the current inertia, decreased reimbursement for office-based surgery, and concerns about implications for patient safety without routine anesthesia involvement. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmologists identified multiple barriers to changing current anesthesia-led sedation models for cataract surgery. Our findings can help inform future efforts to better align anesthesia care with patient and procedural needs in an aging US population.

Perioperative Medicine
Philips (Finland) (FI), Lee University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of San Francisco (US), Columbia University (US), Western University of Health Sciences (US)
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.