Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin-based combination therapies for first-line treatment of malaria among pediatric and adult populations: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review will aim to evaluate the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) when used as a first-line treatment for malaria, providing evidence-based guidance for policymakers in resource-limited settings. INTRODUCTION: ACTs have become the World Health Organization's recommended first-line treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria due to their efficacy. Economic constraints in endemic regions necessitate the assessment of their cost-effectiveness. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies will be eligible if they report on the cost-effectiveness or cost-utility of ACTs and non-ACT or different ACT dose regimens as first-line treatments for malaria among pediatric and adult populations. METHODOLOGY: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of economic evidence. PubMed was used to conduct a preliminary search using MeSH terms such as malaria, artemisinin combination therapy, non-artemisinin combination therapy, and cost-effectiveness. This initial search strategy will be adapted to other academic and non-academic databases as well as gray literature. Two reviewers will independently screen records at the title/abstract and full-text levels, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Two reviewers will then conduct a methodological quality assessment and extract data in accordance with JBI guidelines. A summary and comparison of the included studies will be based on the JBI Dominance Ranking Matrix for economic evaluations. The measures of cost-effectiveness/cost-utility will consist of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), the ICER per disability-adjusted life year averted, or the quality-adjusted life years gained. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach will be used to appraise the certainty of economic evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID: CRD420251058688.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-25-00243
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin-based combination therapies for first-line treatment of malaria among pediatric and adult populations: a systematic review protocol

Bindu MA, Denny John, Saraswathy GR, Akhil Jith et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Malaria Research and Control
article

Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin-based combination therapies for first-line treatment of malaria among pediatric and adult populations: a systematic review protocol

Bindu MA, Denny John, Saraswathy GR, Akhil Jith, Chandrasekhar Janakiram, Spoorthi KR
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review will aim to evaluate the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) when used as a first-line treatment for malaria, providing evidence-based guidance for policymakers in resource-limited settings. INTRODUCTION: ACTs have become the World Health Organization's recommended first-line treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria due to their efficacy. Economic constraints in endemic regions necessitate the assessment of their cost-effectiveness. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies will be eligible if they report on the cost-effectiveness or cost-utility of ACTs and non-ACT or different ACT dose regimens as first-line treatments for malaria among pediatric and adult populations. METHODOLOGY: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of economic evidence. PubMed was used to conduct a preliminary search using MeSH terms such as malaria, artemisinin combination therapy, non-artemisinin combination therapy, and cost-effectiveness. This initial search strategy will be adapted to other academic and non-academic databases as well as gray literature. Two reviewers will independently screen records at the title/abstract and full-text levels, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Two reviewers will then conduct a methodological quality assessment and extract data in accordance with JBI guidelines. A summary and comparison of the included studies will be based on the JBI Dominance Ranking Matrix for economic evaluations. The measures of cost-effectiveness/cost-utility will consist of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), the ICER per disability-adjusted life year averted, or the quality-adjusted life years gained. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach will be used to appraise the certainty of economic evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID: CRD420251058688.

JBI Evidence Synthesis
M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences (IN), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.