Twenty‐five years of simulated demand: A bibliometric and systematic review of hypothetical drug purchase tasks

Since its introduction by Jacobs and Bickel (1999), the hypothetical purchase task (HPT) has emerged as a frequently used methodology in behavioral economics research, particularly in studies of substance use and public health decision making. The HPT represents an approach that seeks to quantify the reinforcing value of drugs and other commodities through parametric, scalable methodology measured via self-reported consumption across escalating prices. Despite its increasing use in research settings, no comprehensive evaluation of its scientific influence has yet been undertaken. To address this gap, we conducted a two-part review of the HPT's empirical legacy. In Study 1, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of all peer-reviewed documents citing Jacobs and Bickel (1999) through mid-2025. In Study 2, we conducted a systematic review of empirical HPT studies employing operant demand analyses to assess drug consumption. We conclude with a discussion on the legacy of Jacobs and Bickel (1999), an evaluation of the present state of the field of operant behavioral economic science in addiction, and a call for critical areas of inquiry in the use of HPTs to measure drug abuse potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.70105
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Twenty‐five years of simulated demand: A bibliometric and systematic review of hypothetical drug purchase tasks

Neil B. Varshneya, David N. Kearns, Matthew L. Banks, Derek D. Reed et al.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Twenty‐five years of simulated demand: A bibliometric and systematic review of hypothetical drug purchase tasks

Neil B. Varshneya, David N. Kearns, Matthew L. Banks, Derek D. Reed, Steven R. Hursh, Brent A. Kaplan, Samuel F. Acuff, Zachary Pierce-Messick, Justin C. Strickland, Brett W. Gelino, Dominic Chiapperino, S. Stevens Negus, Chad J. Reissig, Alexandra Johansen, Madison E. Graham
article en

Abstract

Since its introduction by Jacobs and Bickel (1999), the hypothetical purchase task (HPT) has emerged as a frequently used methodology in behavioral economics research, particularly in studies of substance use and public health decision making. The HPT represents an approach that seeks to quantify the reinforcing value of drugs and other commodities through parametric, scalable methodology measured via self-reported consumption across escalating prices. Despite its increasing use in research settings, no comprehensive evaluation of its scientific influence has yet been undertaken. To address this gap, we conducted a two-part review of the HPT's empirical legacy. In Study 1, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of all peer-reviewed documents citing Jacobs and Bickel (1999) through mid-2025. In Study 2, we conducted a systematic review of empirical HPT studies employing operant demand analyses to assess drug consumption. We conclude with a discussion on the legacy of Jacobs and Bickel (1999), an evaluation of the present state of the field of operant behavioral economic science in addiction, and a call for critical areas of inquiry in the use of HPTs to measure drug abuse potential.

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of BehaviorVol. 125(3)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (US), University of Kentucky (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), American University (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Johnson University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Behavioral Pharma (United States) (US), Institutes for Behavior Resources (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.