Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Real-World Evidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Guselkumab, a selective anti-IL-23p19 monoclonal antibody, has shown high efficacy in randomized trials for moderate-to-severe psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Real-world evidence is essential to assess treatment performance in broader and more heterogeneous patient populations. Objectives: To synthesize the available real-world evidence on the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis and PsA, and to quantify pooled clinical responses across clinically relevant follow-up windows. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for observational real-world studies of guselkumab in adults with psoriasis and/or PsA. Primary pooled outcomes were PASI 90 and PASI 100 in psoriasis and DAPSA < 14 in PsA. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was performed using a logit transformation. Cohort overlap was explicitly assessed and overlapping publications were not allowed to contribute concurrently to the same pooled estimate. Results: Thirty-four studies were included (29 psoriasis, 5 PsA). In psoriasis, pooled PASI 90 response rates were 50.8% (95% CI 46.8–54.8) at 12–16 weeks, 68.4% (95% CI 66.3–70.4) at 20–28 weeks, 71.2% (95% CI 64.9–76.8) at 36–60 weeks, and 77.1% (95% CI 74.9–79.3) at ≥96 weeks. Pooled PASI 100 response rates were 49.8% (95% CI 47.5–52.2) at 20–28 weeks and 49.7% (95% CI 47.1–52.3) at 36–60 weeks. In PsA, pooled DAPSA < 14 response rates were 56.9% (95% CI 23.0–85.3) at 20–28 weeks and 69.5% (95% CI 62.5–75.7) at 48–60 weeks. Safety reporting was heterogeneous, but serious adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events were uncommon. Conclusions: Real-world evidence supports guselkumab as an effective treatment for psoriasis and a clinically useful option for PsA, with a safety profile broadly consistent with the known trial experience. Interpretation remains limited by observational designs, heterogeneous denominators, and inconsistent safety reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103692
Primary Topic
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Real-World Evidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

María José Pedrosa Martinez, Jose Manuel Dodero-Anillo, José Carlos Armario-Hita, Marta Fernandez-Pujol-Marzo et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
article

Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Real-World Evidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

María José Pedrosa Martinez, Jose Manuel Dodero-Anillo, José Carlos Armario-Hita, Marta Fernandez-Pujol-Marzo, Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde
article en

Abstract

Background: Guselkumab, a selective anti-IL-23p19 monoclonal antibody, has shown high efficacy in randomized trials for moderate-to-severe psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Real-world evidence is essential to assess treatment performance in broader and more heterogeneous patient populations. Objectives: To synthesize the available real-world evidence on the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis and PsA, and to quantify pooled clinical responses across clinically relevant follow-up windows. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for observational real-world studies of guselkumab in adults with psoriasis and/or PsA. Primary pooled outcomes were PASI 90 and PASI 100 in psoriasis and DAPSA < 14 in PsA. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was performed using a logit transformation. Cohort overlap was explicitly assessed and overlapping publications were not allowed to contribute concurrently to the same pooled estimate. Results: Thirty-four studies were included (29 psoriasis, 5 PsA). In psoriasis, pooled PASI 90 response rates were 50.8% (95% CI 46.8–54.8) at 12–16 weeks, 68.4% (95% CI 66.3–70.4) at 20–28 weeks, 71.2% (95% CI 64.9–76.8) at 36–60 weeks, and 77.1% (95% CI 74.9–79.3) at ≥96 weeks. Pooled PASI 100 response rates were 49.8% (95% CI 47.5–52.2) at 20–28 weeks and 49.7% (95% CI 47.1–52.3) at 36–60 weeks. In PsA, pooled DAPSA < 14 response rates were 56.9% (95% CI 23.0–85.3) at 20–28 weeks and 69.5% (95% CI 62.5–75.7) at 48–60 weeks. Safety reporting was heterogeneous, but serious adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events were uncommon. Conclusions: Real-world evidence supports guselkumab as an effective treatment for psoriasis and a clinically useful option for PsA, with a safety profile broadly consistent with the known trial experience. Interpretation remains limited by observational designs, heterogeneous denominators, and inconsistent safety reporting.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(10)
Universidad de Cádiz (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES), Hospital Universitario Puerto Real (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.