Auditors’ Perceptions Regarding Cybersecurity and Cybersecurity-Related Materiality

SYNOPSIS In 2023, the PCAOB announced that it would examine how auditors evaluate their client’s cybersecurity-related materiality judgments and compliance with the SEC’s enhanced cybersecurity disclosure rules. These rules require decision-makers to think about materiality more broadly than what is typically required in financial reporting contexts where the focus is on direct financial statement impacts. We interview auditors to examine how they perceive their role with respect to cybersecurity and the factors they consider when making cybersecurity-related materiality judgments. We find that, relative to auditors interviewed in 2023, auditors interviewed in 2025 were more likely to consider factors beyond those having relatively immediate, direct, and easily quantifiable financial statement impacts. However, we also find that auditors continue to experience uncertainty about how to incorporate qualitative factors into their cybersecurity-related materiality judgments. We discuss implications for audit firms, regulators, and future research. Data availability: Data are available from the authors upon request. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42; C83.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Horizons
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2023-094
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditors’ Perceptions Regarding Cybersecurity and Cybersecurity-Related Materiality

Patricia Navarro*, Jonathan Grenier, Yibo Zhang, Michele Frank
Accounting Horizons
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Auditors’ Perceptions Regarding Cybersecurity and Cybersecurity-Related Materiality

Patricia Navarro*, Jonathan Grenier, Yibo Zhang, Michele Frank
article en

Abstract

SYNOPSIS In 2023, the PCAOB announced that it would examine how auditors evaluate their client’s cybersecurity-related materiality judgments and compliance with the SEC’s enhanced cybersecurity disclosure rules. These rules require decision-makers to think about materiality more broadly than what is typically required in financial reporting contexts where the focus is on direct financial statement impacts. We interview auditors to examine how they perceive their role with respect to cybersecurity and the factors they consider when making cybersecurity-related materiality judgments. We find that, relative to auditors interviewed in 2023, auditors interviewed in 2025 were more likely to consider factors beyond those having relatively immediate, direct, and easily quantifiable financial statement impacts. However, we also find that auditors continue to experience uncertainty about how to incorporate qualitative factors into their cybersecurity-related materiality judgments. We discuss implications for audit firms, regulators, and future research. Data availability: Data are available from the authors upon request. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42; C83.

Accounting Horizons
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Miami University (US), Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.