Neural connectivity patterns underlying yes and no responses across sensory modalities

This study explores the neural encoding of binary intentions (“Yes” vs. “No”) using EEG coherence in visual and auditory modalities, focusing on frequency-specific connectivity patterns. EEG data were recorded from 23 participants, with coherence analyzed across five frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma) during a 1,000 ms intention-formation window. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures ANOVA and post-hoc paired t-tests, with FDR correction applied. The analysis revealed significant differences in connectivity for “Yes” and “No” responses. Delta and theta coherence showed stronger connectivity in frontoparietal and frontotemporal networks for “Yes” responses across both modalities. Modality-specific effects were observed in the alpha and beta bands, with the visual modality showing increased alpha coherence for “Yes” responses, while the auditory modality showed the opposite. Gamma coherence was less prominent. These findings suggest that binary intentions are represented through distributed, frequency-specific networks, with delta and theta bands providing robust markers for intention encoding, and alpha/beta modulations reflecting modality-specific processing. This study provides insights into the frequency- and modality-dependent neural mechanisms of intention formation, emphasizing the role of low-frequency coherence in intention decoding and the need for modality-specific models in brain-computer interfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Neuroscience
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13064-026-00254-9
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural connectivity patterns underlying yes and no responses across sensory modalities

Ladan Vaghef, S Hosseini, Sara Sabagh Moghadam
Discover Neuroscience
Cognitive Functions and Memory
article

Neural connectivity patterns underlying yes and no responses across sensory modalities

Ladan Vaghef, S Hosseini, Sara Sabagh Moghadam
article en

Abstract

This study explores the neural encoding of binary intentions (“Yes” vs. “No”) using EEG coherence in visual and auditory modalities, focusing on frequency-specific connectivity patterns. EEG data were recorded from 23 participants, with coherence analyzed across five frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma) during a 1,000 ms intention-formation window. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures ANOVA and post-hoc paired t-tests, with FDR correction applied. The analysis revealed significant differences in connectivity for “Yes” and “No” responses. Delta and theta coherence showed stronger connectivity in frontoparietal and frontotemporal networks for “Yes” responses across both modalities. Modality-specific effects were observed in the alpha and beta bands, with the visual modality showing increased alpha coherence for “Yes” responses, while the auditory modality showed the opposite. Gamma coherence was less prominent. These findings suggest that binary intentions are represented through distributed, frequency-specific networks, with delta and theta bands providing robust markers for intention encoding, and alpha/beta modulations reflecting modality-specific processing. This study provides insights into the frequency- and modality-dependent neural mechanisms of intention formation, emphasizing the role of low-frequency coherence in intention decoding and the need for modality-specific models in brain-computer interfaces.

Discover NeuroscienceVol. 21(1)
Islamic Azad University, Mashhad (IR), Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.