Unveiling and Assessing Antibiotic Misuse in Saudi Arabia—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Antibiotic misuse and prescribing errors are significant concerns in clinical practice, contributing to unnecessary antibiotic exposure, increased adverse effects, rising healthcare costs, and the escalation of antibiotic resistance. Understanding the prevalence, patterns, and risk factors of these prescription errors is essential for improving patient safety and healthcare efficiency in the future. Aim: Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence, patterns, and risk factors of antibiotic prescription errors in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A comprehensive search of three databases (PubMed, Scopus and ProQuest) was conducted to identify eligible cohort and cross-sectional studies in Saudi Arabia published up to January 2025. Studies that reported on error rates of antibiotic prescription errors and those that did not provide quantitative data were excluded. The primary outcome was the prevalence and patterns of inappropriate antibiotic use, while the secondary outcomes included the pooled prevalence of specific errors (i.e., selection, dose, duration, etc.). The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024611747). Results: Fourteen eligible cohort (n = 2) and cross-sectional (n = 12) studies conducted in Saudi Arabia were included in the review. Two studies reviewed medical records and orders of patients. Patient selection varied from emergency department to intensive care units and outpatients. The pooled prevalence of antibiotic prescription errors was 42.7% [95% CI: 37.5–47.8], with common errors including dosage (29.3%), duration (24.3%), selection (15%) and frequency (11.1%) errors. However, there was a high heterogeneity among the results. Overall, the quality assessment revealed a low risk of bias, except for one study with a high risk of bias. Conclusion: These findings highlight the high prevalence of antibiotic prescription errors. Future efforts should strengthen antibiotic stewardship, enhance clinician training, and ensure adherence to evidence-based guidelines to reduce prescription errors and combat antibiotic resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bacteria
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria5020027
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling and Assessing Antibiotic Misuse in Saudi Arabia—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Idris Sula, Yousef Alawi, Lamar Alfuraydi, Hany Lotfy et al.
Bacteria
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Unveiling and Assessing Antibiotic Misuse in Saudi Arabia—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Idris Sula, Yousef Alawi, Lamar Alfuraydi, Hany Lotfy, Reena Almutairi, Nouralhoda Mourabya, Rawan Alharbi, Mateq Ali Alreshidi, Ammar Ramli, Hiba Shokry
article en

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic misuse and prescribing errors are significant concerns in clinical practice, contributing to unnecessary antibiotic exposure, increased adverse effects, rising healthcare costs, and the escalation of antibiotic resistance. Understanding the prevalence, patterns, and risk factors of these prescription errors is essential for improving patient safety and healthcare efficiency in the future. Aim: Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence, patterns, and risk factors of antibiotic prescription errors in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A comprehensive search of three databases (PubMed, Scopus and ProQuest) was conducted to identify eligible cohort and cross-sectional studies in Saudi Arabia published up to January 2025. Studies that reported on error rates of antibiotic prescription errors and those that did not provide quantitative data were excluded. The primary outcome was the prevalence and patterns of inappropriate antibiotic use, while the secondary outcomes included the pooled prevalence of specific errors (i.e., selection, dose, duration, etc.). The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024611747). Results: Fourteen eligible cohort (n = 2) and cross-sectional (n = 12) studies conducted in Saudi Arabia were included in the review. Two studies reviewed medical records and orders of patients. Patient selection varied from emergency department to intensive care units and outpatients. The pooled prevalence of antibiotic prescription errors was 42.7% [95% CI: 37.5–47.8], with common errors including dosage (29.3%), duration (24.3%), selection (15%) and frequency (11.1%) errors. However, there was a high heterogeneity among the results. Overall, the quality assessment revealed a low risk of bias, except for one study with a high risk of bias. Conclusion: These findings highlight the high prevalence of antibiotic prescription errors. Future efforts should strengthen antibiotic stewardship, enhance clinician training, and ensure adherence to evidence-based guidelines to reduce prescription errors and combat antibiotic resistance.

BacteriaVol. 5(2)
Sulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.