The effect of handwriting versus iPad writing on cervical alignment and pinch muscle strength among female university students: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the impact of handwriting versus iPad writing on cervical alignment and pinch muscle strength among female university students at the Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University. METHODS: Thirty female students were divided into two equal groups: Group A engaged in handwriting, and Group B used iPad writing. The mean body mass index of the participants was 25.12 kg/m². Each participant was instructed to write for 15 min. Cervical range of motion (ROM) devices were used to assess cervical flexion, lateral bending, and rotation, whereas key pinch strength was measured to evaluate the strength of the dominant pinch muscles. RESULTS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated no significant differences in the pinch strength outcome variables between the handwriting and iPad writing groups, F (1, 28) = 12.54, P = 0.25; η² = 0.05. The handwriting group exhibited lower mean values within their group compared to the iPad group. Furthermore, a repeated-measures ANOVA comparing the groups revealed no significant difference in the mean cervical range of motion (ROM) in flexion between the two groups (P = 0.67). However, the mean values for the handwriting group increased post-writing compared to those for the iPad group. The repeated-measures ANOVA between groups also demonstrated no significant difference in the mean cervical range of motion values for rotation to the right after writing for either group (P = 0.34) or for the cervical range of motion for rotation to the left (P = 0.49); however, an increase in the mean values of cervical rotation to the right was observed for the handwriting group. CONCLUSIONS: Using an iPad increases the degree of lateral bending and rotation to the left and right. In addition, the degree of right rotation increased in the iPad group. However, key-pinch muscle strength was lower in the handwriting group than in the iPad writing group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09933-4
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of handwriting versus iPad writing on cervical alignment and pinch muscle strength among female university students: a cross-sectional study

Rasha Hamed Al‐Serwi, Amany E. Abd-Eltawab, Mohamed Mahmoud Abdelfattah Abdelrahman, Dalia Mahmoud Abdelmonem Elsherbini et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

The effect of handwriting versus iPad writing on cervical alignment and pinch muscle strength among female university students: a cross-sectional study

Rasha Hamed Al‐Serwi, Amany E. Abd-Eltawab, Mohamed Mahmoud Abdelfattah Abdelrahman, Dalia Mahmoud Abdelmonem Elsherbini, Rawabi Obaid Alshammari, Mohamed A. M. Ali, Mustafa Shukry, Anis Ahmad Chaudhary, Khalid M. Elazab
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the impact of handwriting versus iPad writing on cervical alignment and pinch muscle strength among female university students at the Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University. METHODS: Thirty female students were divided into two equal groups: Group A engaged in handwriting, and Group B used iPad writing. The mean body mass index of the participants was 25.12 kg/m². Each participant was instructed to write for 15 min. Cervical range of motion (ROM) devices were used to assess cervical flexion, lateral bending, and rotation, whereas key pinch strength was measured to evaluate the strength of the dominant pinch muscles. RESULTS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated no significant differences in the pinch strength outcome variables between the handwriting and iPad writing groups, F (1, 28) = 12.54, P = 0.25; η² = 0.05. The handwriting group exhibited lower mean values within their group compared to the iPad group. Furthermore, a repeated-measures ANOVA comparing the groups revealed no significant difference in the mean cervical range of motion (ROM) in flexion between the two groups (P = 0.67). However, the mean values for the handwriting group increased post-writing compared to those for the iPad group. The repeated-measures ANOVA between groups also demonstrated no significant difference in the mean cervical range of motion values for rotation to the right after writing for either group (P = 0.34) or for the cervical range of motion for rotation to the left (P = 0.49); however, an increase in the mean values of cervical rotation to the right was observed for the handwriting group. CONCLUSIONS: Using an iPad increases the degree of lateral bending and rotation to the left and right. In addition, the degree of right rotation increased in the iPad group. However, key-pinch muscle strength was lower in the handwriting group than in the iPad writing group.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Mansoura University (EG), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Jouf University (SA), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), King Faisal University (SA), Jazan University (SA)
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Faisal University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.