Hierarchies of resistance to DNA damage response inhibitors: from pathway restoration to replication stress tolerance

DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors have reshaped precision oncology by exploiting tumor-specific vulnerabilities in genome maintenance and replication stress control. The clinical success of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors-particularly in homologous recombination-deficient cancers-has validated this strategy, establishing a paradigmatic model for DDR-targeted therapies; however, both intrinsic and acquired resistance remain pervasive and limit durable benefit. In this Review, we analyze resistance mechanisms with a framework centered on PARP inhibitor biology, while extending key principles to other DDR-targeting strategies. We propose a hierarchical model that distinguishes dominant resistance drivers-mechanisms that restore DNA repair capacity or bypass the inhibited node (e.g., homologous recombination reactivation or checkpoint rewiring)-from adaptive resistance mechanisms that increase replication stress tolerance without restoring repair function, including replication-fork protection, metabolic reprogramming, cellular plasticity, and microenvironmental support. We discuss how tumor heterogeneity and therapy-imposed selective pressures shape clonal evolution and complicate biomarker development. We also critically evaluate combination strategies, highlighting why strong mechanistic rationale often fails to translate into consistent clinical benefit due to toxicity, scheduling constraints, and insufficient biomarker guidance. Finally, we outline priorities for moving beyond static genomic classifiers toward functional and longitudinal assessment of replication stress, DNA repair engagement, and tumor evolution to support more durable, biologically informed therapeutic strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Hematology and Oncology
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-026-00779-z
Primary Topic
DNA Repair Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hierarchies of resistance to DNA damage response inhibitors: from pathway restoration to replication stress tolerance

Antonio Pezone, Maria Vittoria Napoli, Antonia Feola, Antonella Romano et al.
Experimental Hematology and Oncology
DNA Repair Mechanisms
article

Hierarchies of resistance to DNA damage response inhibitors: from pathway restoration to replication stress tolerance

Antonio Pezone, Maria Vittoria Napoli, Antonia Feola, Antonella Romano, Vittorio Enrico Avvedimento, Antonio Porcellini, Valentina Morgera, Armando Gabrielli
article en

Abstract

DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors have reshaped precision oncology by exploiting tumor-specific vulnerabilities in genome maintenance and replication stress control. The clinical success of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors-particularly in homologous recombination-deficient cancers-has validated this strategy, establishing a paradigmatic model for DDR-targeted therapies; however, both intrinsic and acquired resistance remain pervasive and limit durable benefit. In this Review, we analyze resistance mechanisms with a framework centered on PARP inhibitor biology, while extending key principles to other DDR-targeting strategies. We propose a hierarchical model that distinguishes dominant resistance drivers-mechanisms that restore DNA repair capacity or bypass the inhibited node (e.g., homologous recombination reactivation or checkpoint rewiring)-from adaptive resistance mechanisms that increase replication stress tolerance without restoring repair function, including replication-fork protection, metabolic reprogramming, cellular plasticity, and microenvironmental support. We discuss how tumor heterogeneity and therapy-imposed selective pressures shape clonal evolution and complicate biomarker development. We also critically evaluate combination strategies, highlighting why strong mechanistic rationale often fails to translate into consistent clinical benefit due to toxicity, scheduling constraints, and insufficient biomarker guidance. Finally, we outline priorities for moving beyond static genomic classifiers toward functional and longitudinal assessment of replication stress, DNA repair engagement, and tumor evolution to support more durable, biologically informed therapeutic strategies.

Experimental Hematology and Oncology
Marche Polytechnic University (IT), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Link Campus University (IT), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Competitività
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
DNA Repair Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.