A retrospective comparison of CMV DNA detection in reproductive tract secretions <i>versus</i> urine: increased yield with combined sample testing

Background This study aims to compare cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA detection rates in reproductive tract secretions (RTS) and urine samples and to further evaluate whether multiple specimen testing improves overall CMV DNA detection rates. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 3,804 female participants who provided 4,383 samples (10.95% RTS; 89.05% urine) between January 2020 and June 2024. Analyses included: (1) CMV DNA detection rates across sample types and population subgroups, (2) the impact of single versus multiple specimen testing on CMV DNA detection rates Result CMV DNA was detected in 3.03% (133/4383) of all samples. Positivity rates differed significantly: 9.79% (47/480) for RTS versus 2.20% (86/3903) for urine ( p &lt; 0.001). Single-sample testing yielded a positivity rate of 2.46% (82/3,330), while testing multiple specimens increased this to 5.91% (28/474). Concurrent testing of both urine and RTS yielded the highest positivity rate (15.63%, 20/128). Additionally, median CMV viral load was significantly higher in RTS compared to urine (3.34 ± 1.43 vs . 0.81 ± 1.47, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions The detection rate of CMV DNA in RTS is higher than that in urine. The combined sample testing increases the detection rate of CMV DNA, potentially helping identify women with active viral shedding. These findings inform the development of optimized CMV DNA testing protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21197
Primary Topic
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A retrospective comparison of CMV DNA detection in reproductive tract secretions versus urine: increased yield with combined sample testing

Yongying Bai, Bo Zhu, Kaiqi Wu, Peihao Wu et al.
PeerJ
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
article

A retrospective comparison of CMV DNA detection in reproductive tract secretions versus urine: increased yield with combined sample testing

Yongying Bai, Bo Zhu, Kaiqi Wu, Peihao Wu, Lingwei Hu, Yin Binbin, Shuai Li
article en

Abstract

Background This study aims to compare cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA detection rates in reproductive tract secretions (RTS) and urine samples and to further evaluate whether multiple specimen testing improves overall CMV DNA detection rates. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 3,804 female participants who provided 4,383 samples (10.95% RTS; 89.05% urine) between January 2020 and June 2024. Analyses included: (1) CMV DNA detection rates across sample types and population subgroups, (2) the impact of single versus multiple specimen testing on CMV DNA detection rates Result CMV DNA was detected in 3.03% (133/4383) of all samples. Positivity rates differed significantly: 9.79% (47/480) for RTS versus 2.20% (86/3903) for urine ( p &lt; 0.001). Single-sample testing yielded a positivity rate of 2.46% (82/3,330), while testing multiple specimens increased this to 5.91% (28/474). Concurrent testing of both urine and RTS yielded the highest positivity rate (15.63%, 20/128). Additionally, median CMV viral load was significantly higher in RTS compared to urine (3.34 ± 1.43 vs . 0.81 ± 1.47, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions The detection rate of CMV DNA in RTS is higher than that in urine. The combined sample testing increases the detection rate of CMV DNA, potentially helping identify women with active viral shedding. These findings inform the development of optimized CMV DNA testing protocols.

PeerJVol. 14
Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.