Bridging the gap in patient care: utilization of nutrition risk screening tools in Kenyan referral hospitals

OBJECTIVE: Appropriate nutrition risk screening (NRS) with timely intervention improves malnutrition outcomes; however, limited knowledge and inconsistent use of validated tools hinder effective implementation. This study assessed knowledge and practice of NRS among nurses and nutritionists/dietitians in three Kenyan national referral hospitals-Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), and Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital (KTRH), and established factors influencing implementation of validated nutrition screening tools. A mixed-methods cross-sectional design was used among 349 healthcare professionals through structured questionnaires, complemented by 18 key informant interviews and direct observations. Knowledge and practices related to commonly recommended nutritional screening tools (NRS-2002, MUST, and MST) were evaluated. RESULTS: A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted among 349 healthcare professionals across Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), and Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital (KTRH). Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaires, complemented by 18 key informant interviews and direct clinical observations. Knowledge and practice of commonly used nutritional screening tools (NRS-2002, MUST, and MST) were assessed. The mean knowledge score was 5.04 ± 1.21 (maximum = 8), with MTRH scoring significantly higher than KNH and KTRH (p < 0.001). High knowledge levels were observed among 44% of respondents at MTRH compared with 14% at KNH and 4% at KTRH. The mean practice score was 6.32 ± 2.23 (maximum = 12), with significant variation across hospitals (p < 0.001). Knowledge level, education, and professional experience significantly predicted screening practice. Routine NRS was rarely conducted and relied mainly on anthropometric or clinical indicators rather than validated screening tools. Qualitative findings revealed barriers including limited training, lack of institutional policies, unclear professional responsibilities, and workforce shortages. Strengthening training, integrating standardized screening protocols, and prioritizing high-risk patient groups may improve NRS implementation in resource-constrained hospital settings. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of targeted training interventions and institutional policy reforms in improving the implementation of nutrition risk screening in hospital settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Research Notes
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07834-2
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the gap in patient care: utilization of nutrition risk screening tools in Kenyan referral hospitals

Mahat Jimale Mohamed, Sophie Ochola
BMC Research Notes
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Bridging the gap in patient care: utilization of nutrition risk screening tools in Kenyan referral hospitals

Mahat Jimale Mohamed, Sophie Ochola
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Appropriate nutrition risk screening (NRS) with timely intervention improves malnutrition outcomes; however, limited knowledge and inconsistent use of validated tools hinder effective implementation. This study assessed knowledge and practice of NRS among nurses and nutritionists/dietitians in three Kenyan national referral hospitals-Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), and Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital (KTRH), and established factors influencing implementation of validated nutrition screening tools. A mixed-methods cross-sectional design was used among 349 healthcare professionals through structured questionnaires, complemented by 18 key informant interviews and direct observations. Knowledge and practices related to commonly recommended nutritional screening tools (NRS-2002, MUST, and MST) were evaluated. RESULTS: A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted among 349 healthcare professionals across Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), and Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital (KTRH). Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaires, complemented by 18 key informant interviews and direct clinical observations. Knowledge and practice of commonly used nutritional screening tools (NRS-2002, MUST, and MST) were assessed. The mean knowledge score was 5.04 ± 1.21 (maximum = 8), with MTRH scoring significantly higher than KNH and KTRH (p < 0.001). High knowledge levels were observed among 44% of respondents at MTRH compared with 14% at KNH and 4% at KTRH. The mean practice score was 6.32 ± 2.23 (maximum = 12), with significant variation across hospitals (p < 0.001). Knowledge level, education, and professional experience significantly predicted screening practice. Routine NRS was rarely conducted and relied mainly on anthropometric or clinical indicators rather than validated screening tools. Qualitative findings revealed barriers including limited training, lack of institutional policies, unclear professional responsibilities, and workforce shortages. Strengthening training, integrating standardized screening protocols, and prioritizing high-risk patient groups may improve NRS implementation in resource-constrained hospital settings. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of targeted training interventions and institutional policy reforms in improving the implementation of nutrition risk screening in hospital settings.

BMC Research Notes
Kenyatta University (KE), Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (KE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.