Granlund’s recurrence surfaces revisited and reanalysed

Peatlands provide some of the most continuous and informative archives for reconstructing Holocene environmental and climatic changes. Their potential was recognised in the late 19th century, but systematic investigations began in the early 20th century, notably through the work of Swedish scientists. Among these, Erik Granlund made a particularly influential contribution by identifying a series of “recurrence surfaces” (rekurrensytor, RY) in southern Swedish peat bogs. These stratigraphic boundaries, marking transitions from highly humified to less humified peat, were interpreted as evidence of abrupt shifts from relatively dry and warm phases to wetter and cooler conditions. Based on extensive peatland surveys, Granlund proposed several such shifts during the middle and Late-Holocene. Two of his most distinct recurrence surfaces, RY V (~4250 cal a BP) and RY III (~2550 cal a BP), correspond closely to the globally recognised 4.2 and 2.8 ka climatic events, making his early identification of the 4.2 ka event particularly remarkable. The youngest surfaces, RY II (~1550 cal a BP) and RY I (~750 cal a BP), were less frequently recorded but appear to coincide with climatic fluctuations documented elsewhere in northwestern Europe. The uncertain RY IV (~3150 cal a BP), mainly observed in southwestern Sweden, may represent a local or regionally restricted event. This paper revisits Granlund’s concept of recurrence surfaces, evaluates their significance in light of modern paleoenvironmental approaches, and considers whether aspects of his interpretations may have been influenced by confirmation bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Holocene
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09596836261440848
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Granlund’s recurrence surfaces revisited and reanalysed

Stefan Wastegård
The Holocene
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
article

Granlund’s recurrence surfaces revisited and reanalysed

Stefan Wastegård
article en

Abstract

Peatlands provide some of the most continuous and informative archives for reconstructing Holocene environmental and climatic changes. Their potential was recognised in the late 19th century, but systematic investigations began in the early 20th century, notably through the work of Swedish scientists. Among these, Erik Granlund made a particularly influential contribution by identifying a series of “recurrence surfaces” (rekurrensytor, RY) in southern Swedish peat bogs. These stratigraphic boundaries, marking transitions from highly humified to less humified peat, were interpreted as evidence of abrupt shifts from relatively dry and warm phases to wetter and cooler conditions. Based on extensive peatland surveys, Granlund proposed several such shifts during the middle and Late-Holocene. Two of his most distinct recurrence surfaces, RY V (~4250 cal a BP) and RY III (~2550 cal a BP), correspond closely to the globally recognised 4.2 and 2.8 ka climatic events, making his early identification of the 4.2 ka event particularly remarkable. The youngest surfaces, RY II (~1550 cal a BP) and RY I (~750 cal a BP), were less frequently recorded but appear to coincide with climatic fluctuations documented elsewhere in northwestern Europe. The uncertain RY IV (~3150 cal a BP), mainly observed in southwestern Sweden, may represent a local or regionally restricted event. This paper revisits Granlund’s concept of recurrence surfaces, evaluates their significance in light of modern paleoenvironmental approaches, and considers whether aspects of his interpretations may have been influenced by confirmation bias.

The Holocene
Stockholm University (SE), Bolin Centre for Climate Research (SE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.