Energy Efficiency and Decarbonisation Pathways in Injection Moulding: A Life Cycle Assessment of End-of-Life Allocation Methods

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is extensively employed to support sustainability evaluation in waste management and manufacturing systems; however, outcomes are highly sensitive to methodological decisions, particularly end-of-life (EoL) allocation approaches. This study examines how cut-off and substitution approaches affect the energy performance and decarbonisation potential of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) injection moulding systems. A dual framework is adopted: first, a literature review examines methodological sensitivities in EoL modelling; second, a quantitative case study assesses industrial-scale primary data for the production of durable HDPE bottles (300 mL). The LCA model integrates specific technical parameters, including a 220 °C melt temperature and a 36 s cycle time, ensuring a realistic representation of manufacturing conditions. The results indicate that allocation choices significantly influence calculated impacts, sometimes reversing the relative ranking of configurations. Substitution-based approaches report higher benefits by crediting avoided primary production, while cut-off logic provides more conservative estimates. Quantitative analysis shows that transitioning from open-loop to fully closed-loop configurations reduces cumulative energy demand by 3.2% and freshwater emissions per functional unit by 2.8%. Furthermore, the study identifies a ‘landfill paradox’ specific to HDPE waste within transitional energy systems: due to the carbon sequestration effect of landfilled polymers and current grid emission factors, landfilling exhibits a lower net carbon footprint (0.03 kg CO2-eq./kg) than high-efficiency incineration (1.54 kg CO2-eq./kg). These findings highlight that circular economy evaluations are strongly shaped by methodological assumptions, with direct implications for energy policy. Bridging the gap between specific industrial processing parameters and end-of-life allocation logic underscores the need to incorporate primary industrial data and transparent allocation frameworks to support reliable decision-making in the transition toward low-carbon and energy-efficient manufacturing systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102295
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Efficiency and Decarbonisation Pathways in Injection Moulding: A Life Cycle Assessment of End-of-Life Allocation Methods

Viktória Mannheim, Judit Lovasné Avató, Kinga Szabó
Energies
Municipal Solid Waste Management
article

Energy Efficiency and Decarbonisation Pathways in Injection Moulding: A Life Cycle Assessment of End-of-Life Allocation Methods

Viktória Mannheim, Judit Lovasné Avató, Kinga Szabó
article en

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is extensively employed to support sustainability evaluation in waste management and manufacturing systems; however, outcomes are highly sensitive to methodological decisions, particularly end-of-life (EoL) allocation approaches. This study examines how cut-off and substitution approaches affect the energy performance and decarbonisation potential of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) injection moulding systems. A dual framework is adopted: first, a literature review examines methodological sensitivities in EoL modelling; second, a quantitative case study assesses industrial-scale primary data for the production of durable HDPE bottles (300 mL). The LCA model integrates specific technical parameters, including a 220 °C melt temperature and a 36 s cycle time, ensuring a realistic representation of manufacturing conditions. The results indicate that allocation choices significantly influence calculated impacts, sometimes reversing the relative ranking of configurations. Substitution-based approaches report higher benefits by crediting avoided primary production, while cut-off logic provides more conservative estimates. Quantitative analysis shows that transitioning from open-loop to fully closed-loop configurations reduces cumulative energy demand by 3.2% and freshwater emissions per functional unit by 2.8%. Furthermore, the study identifies a ‘landfill paradox’ specific to HDPE waste within transitional energy systems: due to the carbon sequestration effect of landfilled polymers and current grid emission factors, landfilling exhibits a lower net carbon footprint (0.03 kg CO2-eq./kg) than high-efficiency incineration (1.54 kg CO2-eq./kg). These findings highlight that circular economy evaluations are strongly shaped by methodological assumptions, with direct implications for energy policy. Bridging the gap between specific industrial processing parameters and end-of-life allocation logic underscores the need to incorporate primary industrial data and transparent allocation frameworks to support reliable decision-making in the transition toward low-carbon and energy-efficient manufacturing systems.

EnergiesVol. 19(10)
Budapest University of Economics and Business (HU), University of Debrecen (HU), International Business School (HU)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.