Surgical Margin Status and Minimal Margin Width in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Local Recurrence and Survival Outcomes in a Single-Centre Cohort

Background/Objectives: Optimal surgical margin management in penile squamous cell carcinoma remains debated because organ-preserving surgery must balance oncological control with functional preservation. Historically, wide excision margins have been recommended; however, subsequent evidence has challenged this threshold, shifting practice towards narrower margins without a demonstrated increase in local recurrence. We evaluated whether invasive positive surgical margins and minimal negative margin widths were associated with local recurrence and survival after surgery for penile squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 157 consecutive men who underwent surgical treatment at a single centre between 2011 and 2024. Time-to-event analyses were performed in 131 patients with invasive non-metastatic disease after excluding those with penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN)-only lesions (n = 23) and distant metastases (n = 3) at diagnosis. The margins were classified as either invasive-negative or invasive-positive. Among histologically negative-margin cases, minimal margin width was grouped a priori as <2 mm, 2–5 mm, and >5 mm. Results: The median follow-up was 25 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10–52). In the invasive (M0) cohort, 101/131 patients had invasive-negative margins and 30/131 had invasive-positive margins; local recurrence occurred in 42/131 patients. Margin status was not independently associated with recurrence-free, overall, or cancer-specific survival rates. Non-sparing surgery was associated with a lower hazard of local recurrence, whereas grade 3 (G3) histology independently predicted worse recurrence-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival. Advanced stage according to the Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) classification independently predicted worse cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Among patients with histologically negative margins, outcomes did not differ significantly across the predefined margin-width categories. These findings support tissue-preserving surgery aimed at histologically negative margins within a structured surveillance framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18101535
Primary Topic
Genital Health and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical Margin Status and Minimal Margin Width in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Local Recurrence and Survival Outcomes in a Single-Centre Cohort

Mateusz Czajkowski, Marcin Falis, Jan Mandrysz, Oliver W. Hakenberg et al.
Cancers
Genital Health and Disease
article

Surgical Margin Status and Minimal Margin Width in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Local Recurrence and Survival Outcomes in a Single-Centre Cohort

Mateusz Czajkowski, Marcin Falis, Jan Mandrysz, Oliver W. Hakenberg, Magdalena Sternau, Marcin Matuszewski
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Optimal surgical margin management in penile squamous cell carcinoma remains debated because organ-preserving surgery must balance oncological control with functional preservation. Historically, wide excision margins have been recommended; however, subsequent evidence has challenged this threshold, shifting practice towards narrower margins without a demonstrated increase in local recurrence. We evaluated whether invasive positive surgical margins and minimal negative margin widths were associated with local recurrence and survival after surgery for penile squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 157 consecutive men who underwent surgical treatment at a single centre between 2011 and 2024. Time-to-event analyses were performed in 131 patients with invasive non-metastatic disease after excluding those with penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN)-only lesions (n = 23) and distant metastases (n = 3) at diagnosis. The margins were classified as either invasive-negative or invasive-positive. Among histologically negative-margin cases, minimal margin width was grouped a priori as <2 mm, 2–5 mm, and >5 mm. Results: The median follow-up was 25 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10–52). In the invasive (M0) cohort, 101/131 patients had invasive-negative margins and 30/131 had invasive-positive margins; local recurrence occurred in 42/131 patients. Margin status was not independently associated with recurrence-free, overall, or cancer-specific survival rates. Non-sparing surgery was associated with a lower hazard of local recurrence, whereas grade 3 (G3) histology independently predicted worse recurrence-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival. Advanced stage according to the Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) classification independently predicted worse cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Among patients with histologically negative margins, outcomes did not differ significantly across the predefined margin-width categories. These findings support tissue-preserving surgery aimed at histologically negative margins within a structured surveillance framework.

CancersVol. 18(10)
University of Gdańsk (PL), Jena University Hospital (DE), Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Genital Health and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.