The Hospital Selection Preferences of Refugee Patients and Local Patients: A Comparative Case Study in Turkey

This study aims to investigate whether there are differences between criteria affecting hospital preferences of refugee patients and local patients in countries they migrated to due to war. In addition, whether differences between refugee patients and local patients in terms of demographic characteristics are significant constitutes another aim of study. This study was conducted in a public university hospital in Gaziantep. In this context, data were obtained from local people and refugee patients with temporary protection status who received inpatient treatment in clinics between 01.08.2023 and 30.08.2023 using a face-to-face survey technique regarding criteria affecting hospital preferences. The sample of the study consists of a total of 80 participants, including 40 local residents and 40 patients under temporary protection status. The Best Worst Method was used for pairwise and multiple comparisons of selection criteria. It was observed that there were differences between hospital preferences of local and refugee patients who participated in study. Accordingly, it was seen that the most important criterion affecting hospital preferences of local patients was quality of health services, while criterion of lack of alternatives was most important selection criterion for refugee patients. When we look at sub-selection criteria, it has been determined that while primary preference of local patients in cost criterion is to have social security, first preference element of the refugee population is treatment fees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1628779
Primary Topic
Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Hospital Selection Preferences of Refugee Patients and Local Patients: A Comparative Case Study in Turkey

Ömer Faruk Rençber, Hakan GÜVENER, EMİNE AYHAN, Mehmet Aytekin
Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
article

The Hospital Selection Preferences of Refugee Patients and Local Patients: A Comparative Case Study in Turkey

Ömer Faruk Rençber, Hakan GÜVENER, EMİNE AYHAN, Mehmet Aytekin
article en

Abstract

This study aims to investigate whether there are differences between criteria affecting hospital preferences of refugee patients and local patients in countries they migrated to due to war. In addition, whether differences between refugee patients and local patients in terms of demographic characteristics are significant constitutes another aim of study. This study was conducted in a public university hospital in Gaziantep. In this context, data were obtained from local people and refugee patients with temporary protection status who received inpatient treatment in clinics between 01.08.2023 and 30.08.2023 using a face-to-face survey technique regarding criteria affecting hospital preferences. The sample of the study consists of a total of 80 participants, including 40 local residents and 40 patients under temporary protection status. The Best Worst Method was used for pairwise and multiple comparisons of selection criteria. It was observed that there were differences between hospital preferences of local and refugee patients who participated in study. Accordingly, it was seen that the most important criterion affecting hospital preferences of local patients was quality of health services, while criterion of lack of alternatives was most important selection criterion for refugee patients. When we look at sub-selection criteria, it has been determined that while primary preference of local patients in cost criterion is to have social security, first preference element of the refugee population is treatment fees.

Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler DergisiVol. 36(2)
Gaziantep University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.