Toward trustworthy artificial intelligence in multi-omics: a review of reproducibility, stability, and interpretability

The integration of multi-omics data has become increasingly important in advancing precision medicine and systems biology. However, the reliability and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence (AI) models applied to such data remain critical concerns. This review examines the evolution and current landscape of reproducibility, stability, and interpretability in AI-driven multi-omics analysis. We explore these three pillars of trustworthiness in recent literature, with a particular focus on methodological innovations, benchmarking practices, and biological relevance. Drawing from key publications, including those featured in Briefings in Bioinformatics, we highlight emerging frameworks that aim to make multi-omics models more robust, transparent, and translationally meaningful. We advocate for routine adoption of TRUST-aligned evaluation practices, including structured stability assessments, multi-cohort benchmarking, and standardized model-card reporting, as default components of future multi-omics AI development. We conclude by outlining key challenges and future directions for developing trustworthy AI systems capable of supporting reproducible, interpretable, and clinically meaningful multi-omics research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbag227
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward trustworthy artificial intelligence in multi-omics: a review of reproducibility, stability, and interpretability

Thanh Hoa Vo, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
article

Toward trustworthy artificial intelligence in multi-omics: a review of reproducibility, stability, and interpretability

Thanh Hoa Vo, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le
article en

Abstract

The integration of multi-omics data has become increasingly important in advancing precision medicine and systems biology. However, the reliability and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence (AI) models applied to such data remain critical concerns. This review examines the evolution and current landscape of reproducibility, stability, and interpretability in AI-driven multi-omics analysis. We explore these three pillars of trustworthiness in recent literature, with a particular focus on methodological innovations, benchmarking practices, and biological relevance. Drawing from key publications, including those featured in Briefings in Bioinformatics, we highlight emerging frameworks that aim to make multi-omics models more robust, transparent, and translationally meaningful. We advocate for routine adoption of TRUST-aligned evaluation practices, including structured stability assessments, multi-cohort benchmarking, and standardized model-card reporting, as default components of future multi-omics AI development. We conclude by outlining key challenges and future directions for developing trustworthy AI systems capable of supporting reproducible, interpretable, and clinically meaningful multi-omics research.

Briefings in BioinformaticsVol. 27(3)
Waterford Institute (US), Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW), Taipei Medical University (TW), Waterford Institute of Technology (IE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.