Volatilomic Differentiation of Protected‐Origin Italian Balsamic Vinegars by HS‐SPME‐GC×GC‐TOFMS

Balsamic vinegars produced under Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) schemes differ substantially in raw materials, processing intensity, and aging regimes. Although these differences are expected to shape their volatile composition, a comprehensive chemical characterization capable of reliably discriminating the two denominations remains analytically challenging. In this study, headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS) was used to characterize PDO and PGI balsamic vinegars and to evaluate the feasibility of volatilomic differentiation between the investigated products. Extraction conditions were comparatively assessed using a pooled quality-control sample by evaluating two SPME fiber coatings (PDMS/DVB and DVB/CAR/PDMS) and a high ionic-strength condition (40% w/v NaCl); the DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber combined with salting-out provided the highest analytical response and was selected for subsequent analyses. After peak detection and alignment, 1397 features were initially detected and reduced to 227 after blank and artifact filtering. Mann-Whitney U testing with false discovery rate correction identified 100 statistically significant features, of which 67 were putatively identified. Multivariate analysis revealed a clear separation between PDO and PGI samples: analyzed PDO vinegars were enriched in furanoids, lactones, esters, aldehydes, acids, phenols, ketones, and alcohols, whereas PGI samples showed comparatively higher levels of terpenoids. These chemical trends align with the technological differences between the two production systems. Mapping volatile features to literature-reported odor descriptors suggested that the higher abundance of furanoids, lactones, and related compounds in the PDO samples may contribute to sweeter, caramel-like, creamy, balsamic, woody, and floral nuances. Overall, the integration of HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS with statistical filtering and multivariate analysis demonstrates the feasibility of a volatilomic analytical workflow capable of differentiating selected PDO and PGI products, and establishes a methodological framework for future large-scale studies on authenticity and quality control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Separation Science
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.70442
Primary Topic
Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Volatilomic Differentiation of Protected‐Origin Italian Balsamic Vinegars by HS‐SPME‐GC×GC‐TOFMS

Monica Romagnoli, Sofia Malcangi, Alberto Cavazzini, Allan Polidoro et al.
Journal of Separation Science
Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
article

Volatilomic Differentiation of Protected‐Origin Italian Balsamic Vinegars by HS‐SPME‐GC×GC‐TOFMS

Monica Romagnoli, Sofia Malcangi, Alberto Cavazzini, Allan Polidoro, Flavio A. Franchina
article en

Abstract

Balsamic vinegars produced under Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) schemes differ substantially in raw materials, processing intensity, and aging regimes. Although these differences are expected to shape their volatile composition, a comprehensive chemical characterization capable of reliably discriminating the two denominations remains analytically challenging. In this study, headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS) was used to characterize PDO and PGI balsamic vinegars and to evaluate the feasibility of volatilomic differentiation between the investigated products. Extraction conditions were comparatively assessed using a pooled quality-control sample by evaluating two SPME fiber coatings (PDMS/DVB and DVB/CAR/PDMS) and a high ionic-strength condition (40% w/v NaCl); the DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber combined with salting-out provided the highest analytical response and was selected for subsequent analyses. After peak detection and alignment, 1397 features were initially detected and reduced to 227 after blank and artifact filtering. Mann-Whitney U testing with false discovery rate correction identified 100 statistically significant features, of which 67 were putatively identified. Multivariate analysis revealed a clear separation between PDO and PGI samples: analyzed PDO vinegars were enriched in furanoids, lactones, esters, aldehydes, acids, phenols, ketones, and alcohols, whereas PGI samples showed comparatively higher levels of terpenoids. These chemical trends align with the technological differences between the two production systems. Mapping volatile features to literature-reported odor descriptors suggested that the higher abundance of furanoids, lactones, and related compounds in the PDO samples may contribute to sweeter, caramel-like, creamy, balsamic, woody, and floral nuances. Overall, the integration of HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS with statistical filtering and multivariate analysis demonstrates the feasibility of a volatilomic analytical workflow capable of differentiating selected PDO and PGI products, and establishes a methodological framework for future large-scale studies on authenticity and quality control.

Journal of Separation ScienceVol. 49(5)
University of Ferrara (IT)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.