Appendix A — Methodological Validation Script

Update I: Appendix A — Methodological Validation Supplement: The record now includes the analysis pipeline source code and the raw bitstring dataset for the worked example, enabling independent inspection and reproduction of the structural findings reported above. The tool processes SHA hash outputs and password bitstrings through identical code paths — methodological symmetry verifiable line by line in source — so any statistical asymmetry between SHA-derived and password-derived results is a property of the data, not of the analysis. Reviewers may reproduce the per-layer match patterns on the provided dataset and additionally verify on independently generated password-hash pairs that the reported structural signature does not appear in random control data. The package contains the analysis layer only; the preimage-generation engine remains outside the public record. Contents: Step_2_Analyse_binärer_code_krypto_XIIJ.py — GCIS Bitstring Search Tool (Version XIII, Preprint Edition) bitstrings_Password.csv — Raw bitstring dataset for the documented worked example ____________________________ This preprint reports reproducible architectural patterns in the activation manifold of a self-organizing neural network (GCIS / ZEUS) that localize SHA-256 password preimages within prime-bit-size layers. Across eight independent runs with fresh random initialization, three methodologically distinct diagnostics converge on the same structural reading: the network organizes preimage information geometrically, and the geometry is reproducible across initializations. Key findings: - Architectural template across 8 runs: 174 layer pairs satisfy three structural conditions without exception — prime bit-sizes, layer-index gap of exactly 2 or 10, and password byte distribution symmetric within each pair to within fractions of a percent. - Partial blind byte recovery: A count-based candidate filter with frozen rules recovers 50–53% of true preimage bytes across three runs against the printable-ASCII universe (Fisher combined p = 1.23 × 10⁻⁴, against a random expectation of 33.7%). - Geometric mirror/gauge signal: A position-template correlation under symmetry transforms survives in 8/8 runs against random printable controls, under both permissive and strict layer-selection variants (Fisher combined p ≈ 2.1 × 10⁻⁹). - Bypass rather than break: The findings do not algebraically invert SHA-256, MD5, or ECC, but empirically challenge the operational assumption that cryptographic outputs are structure-blind to neural geometric reading. This threat model is not addressed by the post-quantum cryptography programme.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20127875
Primary Topic
User Authentication and Security Systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Appendix A — Methodological Validation Script

Stefan Trauth
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
User Authentication and Security Systems
preprint

Appendix A — Methodological Validation Script

Stefan Trauth
preprint en

Abstract

Update I: Appendix A — Methodological Validation Supplement: The record now includes the analysis pipeline source code and the raw bitstring dataset for the worked example, enabling independent inspection and reproduction of the structural findings reported above. The tool processes SHA hash outputs and password bitstrings through identical code paths — methodological symmetry verifiable line by line in source — so any statistical asymmetry between SHA-derived and password-derived results is a property of the data, not of the analysis. Reviewers may reproduce the per-layer match patterns on the provided dataset and additionally verify on independently generated password-hash pairs that the reported structural signature does not appear in random control data. The package contains the analysis layer only; the preimage-generation engine remains outside the public record. Contents: Step_2_Analyse_binärer_code_krypto_XIIJ.py — GCIS Bitstring Search Tool (Version XIII, Preprint Edition) bitstrings_Password.csv — Raw bitstring dataset for the documented worked example ____________________________ This preprint reports reproducible architectural patterns in the activation manifold of a self-organizing neural network (GCIS / ZEUS) that localize SHA-256 password preimages within prime-bit-size layers. Across eight independent runs with fresh random initialization, three methodologically distinct diagnostics converge on the same structural reading: the network organizes preimage information geometrically, and the geometry is reproducible across initializations. Key findings: - Architectural template across 8 runs: 174 layer pairs satisfy three structural conditions without exception — prime bit-sizes, layer-index gap of exactly 2 or 10, and password byte distribution symmetric within each pair to within fractions of a percent. - Partial blind byte recovery: A count-based candidate filter with frozen rules recovers 50–53% of true preimage bytes across three runs against the printable-ASCII universe (Fisher combined p = 1.23 × 10⁻⁴, against a random expectation of 33.7%). - Geometric mirror/gauge signal: A position-template correlation under symmetry transforms survives in 8/8 runs against random printable controls, under both permissive and strict layer-selection variants (Fisher combined p ≈ 2.1 × 10⁻⁹). - Bypass rather than break: The findings do not algebraically invert SHA-256, MD5, or ECC, but empirically challenge the operational assumption that cryptographic outputs are structure-blind to neural geometric reading. This threat model is not addressed by the post-quantum cryptography programme.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
User Authentication and Security Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.