Explaining Bird Richness With 30‐m Resolution Dynamic Habitat Indices Derived From Landsat Satellite Data Across the Conterminous <scp>US</scp>

ABSTRACT Aim Biodiversity is declining at a rapid rate, and effective conservation necessitates understanding the drivers of species richness patterns at management‐relevant scales. Vegetation productivity data derived from satellite data estimate the available energy in ecosystems, allowing the generation of relevant indices that explain biodiversity patterns. The Dynamic Habitat Indices (DHIs) summarise three metrics of annual productivity. Our goal was to compare the predictive performance of DHIs derived from higher spatial but lower temporal resolution (Landsat) versus coarser spatial but higher temporal resolution (MODIS) in models explaining bird richness. Location The conterminous United States. Methods Using North American Breeding Bird Survey data, we calculated richness overall and for nine functional guilds for two periods (1991–2000, 2011–2019). We summarised the DHIs from Landsat (1991–2000, 2011–2020) and MODIS (2011–2020) at four spatial extents, matching our bird data for (a) 85 ecoregions, (b) 5‐km squares matching the area surveyed by a full BBS route, (c) 2.5‐km squares matching the first ten stops, and (d) 0.5‐km square buffers matching the first stop. Results The predictive performance of DHIs based on Landsat and MODIS for the four spatial extents was similar, and Landsat DHIs explained up to 48% of the variance in bird richness. In multivariate models combining Landsat DHIs with topography and land cover, the DHIs complemented other variables well and explained up to 65% of the variance in bird richness. The predictive performance of 1991–2000 Landsat DHIs was similar to that of the 2011–2020 Landsat DHIs, despite considerably fewer Landsat images being available in the 1990s. Main Conclusions Despite its lower temporal resolution, the finer spatial resolution of Landsat DHIs explained species richness well. Landsat‐based DHIs offer the advantage of management‐relevant resolution over broad areas and capture more of the heterogeneity in landcover that small bodied species respond to than coarser resolution products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biogeography
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.70239
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining Bird Richness With 30‐m Resolution Dynamic Habitat Indices Derived From Landsat Satellite Data Across the Conterminous US

Laura S. Farwell, Elena Razenkova, Anna M. Pidgeon, Paul R. Elsen et al.
Journal of Biogeography
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Explaining Bird Richness With 30‐m Resolution Dynamic Habitat Indices Derived From Landsat Satellite Data Across the Conterminous US

Laura S. Farwell, Elena Razenkova, Anna M. Pidgeon, Paul R. Elsen, Kathleen A. Carroll, Volker C. Radeloff
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Biodiversity is declining at a rapid rate, and effective conservation necessitates understanding the drivers of species richness patterns at management‐relevant scales. Vegetation productivity data derived from satellite data estimate the available energy in ecosystems, allowing the generation of relevant indices that explain biodiversity patterns. The Dynamic Habitat Indices (DHIs) summarise three metrics of annual productivity. Our goal was to compare the predictive performance of DHIs derived from higher spatial but lower temporal resolution (Landsat) versus coarser spatial but higher temporal resolution (MODIS) in models explaining bird richness. Location The conterminous United States. Methods Using North American Breeding Bird Survey data, we calculated richness overall and for nine functional guilds for two periods (1991–2000, 2011–2019). We summarised the DHIs from Landsat (1991–2000, 2011–2020) and MODIS (2011–2020) at four spatial extents, matching our bird data for (a) 85 ecoregions, (b) 5‐km squares matching the area surveyed by a full BBS route, (c) 2.5‐km squares matching the first ten stops, and (d) 0.5‐km square buffers matching the first stop. Results The predictive performance of DHIs based on Landsat and MODIS for the four spatial extents was similar, and Landsat DHIs explained up to 48% of the variance in bird richness. In multivariate models combining Landsat DHIs with topography and land cover, the DHIs complemented other variables well and explained up to 65% of the variance in bird richness. The predictive performance of 1991–2000 Landsat DHIs was similar to that of the 2011–2020 Landsat DHIs, despite considerably fewer Landsat images being available in the 1990s. Main Conclusions Despite its lower temporal resolution, the finer spatial resolution of Landsat DHIs explained species richness well. Landsat‐based DHIs offer the advantage of management‐relevant resolution over broad areas and capture more of the heterogeneity in landcover that small bodied species respond to than coarser resolution products.

Journal of BiogeographyVol. 53(5)
Wildlife Conservation Society (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Rhode Island (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.