Intraoperative Margin Control in Eyelid Tumor Surgery: Current Standards, Imaging Advances, and Emerging Techniques

Background: Eyelid malignancies require accurate intraoperative margin control to achieve complete tumor excision while preserving the functional and aesthetic integrity of the periocular region. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is widely regarded as the reference standard for margin-controlled excision, whereas frozen section–controlled excision (FSC) represents a reliable and widely used alternative in oculoplastic practice. In parallel, several emerging imaging technologies are being investigated to improve real-time tumor detection and surgical precision. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted to summarize current evidence on intraoperative margin control in eyelid tumor surgery. The review focused on established surgical techniques, including MMS and FSC, as well as emerging imaging modalities such as fluorescence confocal microscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography, line-field confocal optical coherence tomography, photoacoustic imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis. Results: MMS provides complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment and remains the benchmark for high-risk, recurrent, and poorly defined periocular tumors, particularly basal cell carcinoma. FSC offers favorable oncologic outcomes, allows immediate reconstruction, and remains an effective option when MMS is not available. Emerging imaging modalities have shown promising diagnostic performance for tumor detection, presurgical mapping, and intraoperative support, particularly in basal cell carcinoma, although evidence in periocular tumors remains limited for most techniques. AI-assisted approaches have also demonstrated high accuracy in the interpretation of frozen sections and optical imaging data, suggesting potential to improve workflow efficiency and diagnostic consistency. Conclusions: MMS and FSC remain the current standards for intraoperative margin control in eyelid tumor surgery. Emerging imaging technologies and AI-based tools may further enhance surgical precision and tissue preservation, but most remain investigational in the periocular setting. Further prospective studies are needed to validate their clinical utility, define standardized workflows, and clarify their role alongside established histopathologic techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33050273
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraoperative Margin Control in Eyelid Tumor Surgery: Current Standards, Imaging Advances, and Emerging Techniques

Michele Nardella, Francesco M. Quaranta Leoni, Claudia Pirro, Anna Argentesi et al.
Current Oncology
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
article

Intraoperative Margin Control in Eyelid Tumor Surgery: Current Standards, Imaging Advances, and Emerging Techniques

Michele Nardella, Francesco M. Quaranta Leoni, Claudia Pirro, Anna Argentesi, Claudia Quaranta Leoni
article en

Abstract

Background: Eyelid malignancies require accurate intraoperative margin control to achieve complete tumor excision while preserving the functional and aesthetic integrity of the periocular region. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is widely regarded as the reference standard for margin-controlled excision, whereas frozen section–controlled excision (FSC) represents a reliable and widely used alternative in oculoplastic practice. In parallel, several emerging imaging technologies are being investigated to improve real-time tumor detection and surgical precision. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted to summarize current evidence on intraoperative margin control in eyelid tumor surgery. The review focused on established surgical techniques, including MMS and FSC, as well as emerging imaging modalities such as fluorescence confocal microscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography, line-field confocal optical coherence tomography, photoacoustic imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis. Results: MMS provides complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment and remains the benchmark for high-risk, recurrent, and poorly defined periocular tumors, particularly basal cell carcinoma. FSC offers favorable oncologic outcomes, allows immediate reconstruction, and remains an effective option when MMS is not available. Emerging imaging modalities have shown promising diagnostic performance for tumor detection, presurgical mapping, and intraoperative support, particularly in basal cell carcinoma, although evidence in periocular tumors remains limited for most techniques. AI-assisted approaches have also demonstrated high accuracy in the interpretation of frozen sections and optical imaging data, suggesting potential to improve workflow efficiency and diagnostic consistency. Conclusions: MMS and FSC remain the current standards for intraoperative margin control in eyelid tumor surgery. Emerging imaging technologies and AI-based tools may further enhance surgical precision and tissue preservation, but most remain investigational in the periocular setting. Further prospective studies are needed to validate their clinical utility, define standardized workflows, and clarify their role alongside established histopathologic techniques.

Current OncologyVol. 33(5)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), Fondazione Roma (IT), Fatebenefratelli Hospital (IT), Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dei Carcinomi dell’Apparato Digerente (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.