Change and continuity in Scottish job quality: what six years of <i>Working Lives Scotland</i> taught us

Purpose The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD)’s Working Lives Scotland report has provided annual insights into job quality across Scotland since it was first published in 2020. Spanning periods just before the COVID-19 pandemic, at its height as well as after it, it allows us to look at how aspects of job quality changed – or indeed did not – over time. The purpose of this paper is to summarise key findings across the series. Design/methodology/approach Working Lives Scotland is underpinned by a survey of over 1,000 Scottish employees, weighted to be representative of Scottish adults over 16. It is based on the seven dimensions of good work as conceptualised by the CIPD and measures not only different job quality elements (job design, work-life balance and employee voice) but also job quality outcomes (job satisfaction, performance and likelihood to quit) and their respective associations. Findings We find consistent gaps in fair work, with differences between organisational characteristics (occupations, sectors and business size) and individual characteristics (gender, age and disability). We can see evidence of job quality clustering, with several positive elements of fair work linking together for some employees (higher salary, better job autonomy and more flexible working) and several negative ones for others (higher workloads, poorer resources and excessive stress). We can also infer trade-offs employees make, be it consciously or unconsciously, between job quality elements. Originality/value There are implications from these findings for practitioners and policymakers alike. Primarily, we consistently highlight the relationship between fair work and job quality outcomes – from job satisfaction through task and contextual performance to retention and staff engagement. While the report offers insights annually, this article summarises the series as a whole, with changes and continuity highlighted throughout, and puts the findings in context of the fair work agenda in Scotland.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Employee Relations
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/er-12-2025-1083
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Change and continuity in Scottish job quality: what six years of Working Lives Scotland taught us

Marek Zemanik
Employee Relations
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Change and continuity in Scottish job quality: what six years of Working Lives Scotland taught us

Marek Zemanik
article en

Abstract

Purpose The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD)’s Working Lives Scotland report has provided annual insights into job quality across Scotland since it was first published in 2020. Spanning periods just before the COVID-19 pandemic, at its height as well as after it, it allows us to look at how aspects of job quality changed – or indeed did not – over time. The purpose of this paper is to summarise key findings across the series. Design/methodology/approach Working Lives Scotland is underpinned by a survey of over 1,000 Scottish employees, weighted to be representative of Scottish adults over 16. It is based on the seven dimensions of good work as conceptualised by the CIPD and measures not only different job quality elements (job design, work-life balance and employee voice) but also job quality outcomes (job satisfaction, performance and likelihood to quit) and their respective associations. Findings We find consistent gaps in fair work, with differences between organisational characteristics (occupations, sectors and business size) and individual characteristics (gender, age and disability). We can see evidence of job quality clustering, with several positive elements of fair work linking together for some employees (higher salary, better job autonomy and more flexible working) and several negative ones for others (higher workloads, poorer resources and excessive stress). We can also infer trade-offs employees make, be it consciously or unconsciously, between job quality elements. Originality/value There are implications from these findings for practitioners and policymakers alike. Primarily, we consistently highlight the relationship between fair work and job quality outcomes – from job satisfaction through task and contextual performance to retention and staff engagement. While the report offers insights annually, this article summarises the series as a whole, with changes and continuity highlighted throughout, and puts the findings in context of the fair work agenda in Scotland.

Employee Relations
Centro de Investigación Docencia y Consultoria Administrativa (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.