Best practices for herpesvirus genomics

Abstract: Since the introduction of high-throughput, massively parallel deep sequencing, the field of viral genomics has blossomed. A single viral genome – even for large double-stranded DNA herpesviruses – can now be sequenced in a matter of hours, and with an initial draft assembled in as little as one day. This is a vast improvement on the multi-year and multi-lab efforts required to sequence the first-ever genome of each herpesvirus species. However, these genomes still present many challenges in the form of extensive repeat regions, rampant recombination, and structural variants such as isomers – all of which contribute to the minor variants and standing population diversity found in these infections. A wide range of experimental and computational methods have emerged to support downstream genome analyses, including phylogenetics, transcriptomics, and chromatin profiling. Yet experimental design, computational parameters, and even terminology can lead to very different interpretations of viral biology based on these genomic approaches. Since 2017, each in-person meeting of the International Herpesvirus Workshop (IHW) has included an open community-wide discussion of methods for herpesvirus genomics. Here we summarize the current best practices in herpesvirus genomics, spanning genome sequencing, population diversity, transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses, and data sharing. We also identify areas requiring further standardization, including genome annotation and reporting practices. By sharing these community-driven recommendations, this review aims to support reproducible and comparable research across the field. This will facilitate the adaptation of future methodological advances, even as our understanding of these diverse viruses keeps pace with viral evolution. Feedback on this preprint is welcome! Submit feedback here: https://forms.gle/N9iDgF8Dmgj9yKyu9

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126183
Primary Topic
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Best practices for herpesvirus genomics

Jakob Trimpert, Cristina Venturini, Daniel Pearce Depledge, Denise Whitby et al.
Open MIND
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
preprint

Best practices for herpesvirus genomics

Jakob Trimpert, Cristina Venturini, Daniel Pearce Depledge, Denise Whitby, Markus Landthaler, Scott Schmid, Lars Dölken, Wolfram Brune, Curtis R. Brandt, Adam W. Whisnant, Beate Sodeik, Moriah Szpara, Dirk P Dittmer, Adam Grundhoff, Judith Breuer, Thomas Günther, Emanuel Wyler, Elena M Cornejo Castro
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract: Since the introduction of high-throughput, massively parallel deep sequencing, the field of viral genomics has blossomed. A single viral genome – even for large double-stranded DNA herpesviruses – can now be sequenced in a matter of hours, and with an initial draft assembled in as little as one day. This is a vast improvement on the multi-year and multi-lab efforts required to sequence the first-ever genome of each herpesvirus species. However, these genomes still present many challenges in the form of extensive repeat regions, rampant recombination, and structural variants such as isomers – all of which contribute to the minor variants and standing population diversity found in these infections. A wide range of experimental and computational methods have emerged to support downstream genome analyses, including phylogenetics, transcriptomics, and chromatin profiling. Yet experimental design, computational parameters, and even terminology can lead to very different interpretations of viral biology based on these genomic approaches. Since 2017, each in-person meeting of the International Herpesvirus Workshop (IHW) has included an open community-wide discussion of methods for herpesvirus genomics. Here we summarize the current best practices in herpesvirus genomics, spanning genome sequencing, population diversity, transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses, and data sharing. We also identify areas requiring further standardization, including genome annotation and reporting practices. By sharing these community-driven recommendations, this review aims to support reproducible and comparable research across the field. This will facilitate the adaptation of future methodological advances, even as our understanding of these diverse viruses keeps pace with viral evolution. Feedback on this preprint is welcome! Submit feedback here: https://forms.gle/N9iDgF8Dmgj9yKyu9

Open MIND
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Leibniz Institute of Virology (LIV) (DE), Kansas State University (US), Max Delbrück Center (DE), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Canadian Society of Microbiologists (CA), German Center for Infection Research (DE), Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US), University College London (GB)
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.