Pediatric Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Sensitization Patterns for a Practical Panel

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is increasingly recognized in the pediatric population. Although patch testing is the gold standard for diagnosis, the absence of standardized, evidence-based pediatric patch test panels and limited access to comprehensive allergen series in many settings pose significant diagnostic challenges. This study aimed to evaluate a practical and shortened patch test panel suitable for children with ACD. METHODS: The clinical characteristics and patch test results of pediatric patients diagnosed with ACD between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patch testing was performed using the Thin-Layer Rapid-Use Epicutaneous (T.R.U.E.) Test, and allergen positivity was evaluated according to age groups. RESULTS: A total of 86 children were included (54.7% girls), with a mean age of 7.7 ± 3.7 years (range: 1-17 years). Nickel was the most frequently detected allergen across all age groups. Formaldehyde resin, cl+me+isothiazolinone, and fragrance mix were the most common allergens in children aged 1-6 and 7-12 years. A patch test panel consisting of 14 allergens was sufficient to identify relevant sensitizations in all age groups. CONCLUSION: Standard patch test panels are often difficult to apply in children due to limited body surface area and practical constraints. Shortened, targeted patch test panels containing the most relevant allergens may improve diagnostic feasibility, particularly in pediatric patients and in settings with limited access to extensive allergen series.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Archives of Allergy and Immunology
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000552351
Primary Topic
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pediatric Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Sensitization Patterns for a Practical Panel

Nilay Çalışkan, Deniz Ozceker, Merve Şendal
International Archives of Allergy and Immunology
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
article

Pediatric Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Sensitization Patterns for a Practical Panel

Nilay Çalışkan, Deniz Ozceker, Merve Şendal
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is increasingly recognized in the pediatric population. Although patch testing is the gold standard for diagnosis, the absence of standardized, evidence-based pediatric patch test panels and limited access to comprehensive allergen series in many settings pose significant diagnostic challenges. This study aimed to evaluate a practical and shortened patch test panel suitable for children with ACD. METHODS: The clinical characteristics and patch test results of pediatric patients diagnosed with ACD between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patch testing was performed using the Thin-Layer Rapid-Use Epicutaneous (T.R.U.E.) Test, and allergen positivity was evaluated according to age groups. RESULTS: A total of 86 children were included (54.7% girls), with a mean age of 7.7 ± 3.7 years (range: 1-17 years). Nickel was the most frequently detected allergen across all age groups. Formaldehyde resin, cl+me+isothiazolinone, and fragrance mix were the most common allergens in children aged 1-6 and 7-12 years. A patch test panel consisting of 14 allergens was sufficient to identify relevant sensitizations in all age groups. CONCLUSION: Standard patch test panels are often difficult to apply in children due to limited body surface area and practical constraints. Shortened, targeted patch test panels containing the most relevant allergens may improve diagnostic feasibility, particularly in pediatric patients and in settings with limited access to extensive allergen series.

International Archives of Allergy and Immunology
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.