Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Intradural Spinal Tumor Resections: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and factors influencing postoperative neurological status in patients undergoing resection of intradural spinal tumors, with particular emphasis on the role of preoperative neurological function and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 108 patients who underwent surgical resection of intradural spinal tumors at a single neurosurgical center. Patients were categorized into intradural extramedullary (IDEM) and intramedullary (IM) tumor groups. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a new or worsened postoperative motor deficit at discharge. Secondary endpoints included postoperative sphincter dysfunction and functional status assessed using the modified McCormick scale at discharge and at 6-month follow-up. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables using the Mann–Whitney U test. Results. A total of 108 patients were included (61.1% female; mean age 55.7 ± 15.6 years). IDEM tumors accounted for 77 cases, while 31 were intramedullary. There were no significant differences between IDEM and IM tumors in the rate of new or worsened postoperative motor deficits (9.1% vs. 6.7%, p = 1.000), postoperative sphincter dysfunction (2.6% vs. 0%, p = 1.000), or functional outcomes assessed using the modified McCormick scale at discharge (p = 0.85) and at 6 months (p = 0.24). Preoperative motor deficit was strongly associated with postoperative motor dysfunction in the overall cohort (86% vs. 14%, p < 0.001), with an even stronger effect observed in the IM subgroup (90.9% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001). IONM was used in 34.3% of cases and was significantly associated with tumor location, histopathology, and surgical complexity. However, IONM use was not associated with postoperative motor outcomes (p = 0.645). Conclusions. Postoperative neurological outcomes following intradural spinal tumor resection are comparable between intramedullary and extramedullary lesions. Preoperative motor deficit is the strongest predictor of postoperative neurological status, particularly in intramedullary tumors, underscoring the importance of early surgical intervention. IONM is preferentially used in higher-risk cases and should be interpreted as a marker of surgical complexity rather than an independent determinant of outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103669
Primary Topic
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Intradural Spinal Tumor Resections: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Sara Chmielewska, Bogdan Czapiga, Anastasija Krzemińska, Marta Koźba-Gosztyła
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
article

Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Intradural Spinal Tumor Resections: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Sara Chmielewska, Bogdan Czapiga, Anastasija Krzemińska, Marta Koźba-Gosztyła
article en

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and factors influencing postoperative neurological status in patients undergoing resection of intradural spinal tumors, with particular emphasis on the role of preoperative neurological function and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 108 patients who underwent surgical resection of intradural spinal tumors at a single neurosurgical center. Patients were categorized into intradural extramedullary (IDEM) and intramedullary (IM) tumor groups. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a new or worsened postoperative motor deficit at discharge. Secondary endpoints included postoperative sphincter dysfunction and functional status assessed using the modified McCormick scale at discharge and at 6-month follow-up. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables using the Mann–Whitney U test. Results. A total of 108 patients were included (61.1% female; mean age 55.7 ± 15.6 years). IDEM tumors accounted for 77 cases, while 31 were intramedullary. There were no significant differences between IDEM and IM tumors in the rate of new or worsened postoperative motor deficits (9.1% vs. 6.7%, p = 1.000), postoperative sphincter dysfunction (2.6% vs. 0%, p = 1.000), or functional outcomes assessed using the modified McCormick scale at discharge (p = 0.85) and at 6 months (p = 0.24). Preoperative motor deficit was strongly associated with postoperative motor dysfunction in the overall cohort (86% vs. 14%, p < 0.001), with an even stronger effect observed in the IM subgroup (90.9% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001). IONM was used in 34.3% of cases and was significantly associated with tumor location, histopathology, and surgical complexity. However, IONM use was not associated with postoperative motor outcomes (p = 0.645). Conclusions. Postoperative neurological outcomes following intradural spinal tumor resection are comparable between intramedullary and extramedullary lesions. Preoperative motor deficit is the strongest predictor of postoperative neurological status, particularly in intramedullary tumors, underscoring the importance of early surgical intervention. IONM is preferentially used in higher-risk cases and should be interpreted as a marker of surgical complexity rather than an independent determinant of outcomes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(10)
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (PL), Military Hospital (PK), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.