Training and credentialing in robotic general surgery

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted surgery is now embedded across many domains of general surgery; however, training and credentialing frameworks have not evolved at the same pace as technological adoption. As a result, significant variability exists in access to training, definitions of competency and proficiency, assessment standards, and institutional credentialing practices. These inconsistencies raise concerns regarding patient safety, equity of access, and workforce preparedness, particularly in the context of expanding robotic platforms and parallel learning curves among trainees and established surgeons. METHODS: This narrative review aims to (1) clarify and define key concepts relevant to robotic surgical training, including competency, proficiency, benchmarking, and credentialing; (2) synthesise current barriers to effective robotic training across the surgical career continuum; and (3) propose a structured, standardised, and platform-agnostic credentialing pathway for robotic general surgery. Drawing on published literature and international consensus work, we identify challenges related to system access, lack of standardisation, training capacity, service pressures, and limited use of objective performance metrics and feedback mechanisms. RESULTS: We propose a competency-based credentialing framework incorporating simulation-based foundational training, modular procedural progression, non-technical skills development, structured mentorship, and objective assessment using validated metrics. The pathway is designed to be adaptable across institutions and applicable to both surgical trainees and consultants, while remaining independent of vendor-specific credentialing models. CONCLUSION: Establishing a standardised approach to robotic training and credentialing is essential to ensure safe implementation, support proficiency development, and enable equitable access to robotic surgery. Coordinated action from professional bodies, training institutions, and healthcare systems will be required to deliver a future-ready robotic surgical workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-026-05129-3
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training and credentialing in robotic general surgery

Bruno Augusto Alves Martins, Deena Harji MBChB, A. Saklani, Helen Mohan et al.
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Training and credentialing in robotic general surgery

Bruno Augusto Alves Martins, Deena Harji MBChB, A. Saklani, Helen Mohan, Rahila Essani, Matthew Leary Harris
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted surgery is now embedded across many domains of general surgery; however, training and credentialing frameworks have not evolved at the same pace as technological adoption. As a result, significant variability exists in access to training, definitions of competency and proficiency, assessment standards, and institutional credentialing practices. These inconsistencies raise concerns regarding patient safety, equity of access, and workforce preparedness, particularly in the context of expanding robotic platforms and parallel learning curves among trainees and established surgeons. METHODS: This narrative review aims to (1) clarify and define key concepts relevant to robotic surgical training, including competency, proficiency, benchmarking, and credentialing; (2) synthesise current barriers to effective robotic training across the surgical career continuum; and (3) propose a structured, standardised, and platform-agnostic credentialing pathway for robotic general surgery. Drawing on published literature and international consensus work, we identify challenges related to system access, lack of standardisation, training capacity, service pressures, and limited use of objective performance metrics and feedback mechanisms. RESULTS: We propose a competency-based credentialing framework incorporating simulation-based foundational training, modular procedural progression, non-technical skills development, structured mentorship, and objective assessment using validated metrics. The pathway is designed to be adaptable across institutions and applicable to both surgical trainees and consultants, while remaining independent of vendor-specific credentialing models. CONCLUSION: Establishing a standardised approach to robotic training and credentialing is essential to ensure safe implementation, support proficiency development, and enable equitable access to robotic surgery. Coordinated action from professional bodies, training institutions, and healthcare systems will be required to deliver a future-ready robotic surgical workforce.

International Journal of Colorectal Disease
AdventHealth Orlando (US), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Tata Memorial Hospital (IN), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), University of Manchester (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Hospital Universitário de Brasília (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.