Spatial AI consistently preferred to state-of-the-art hearing aids in multitalker noise

OBJECTIVE: We examined the Spatial AI model running on the Fortell AI hearing aids to see whether it improves perceived ease of understanding in noisy, multitalker environments relative to hearing aids using more traditional processing. DESIGN: In a blinded, randomised-controlled trial, participants compared the investigational hearing aid to five control hearing aids, representing the latest technology from the five major hearing aid manufacturers. Recordings of the hearing aids in noisy, multitalker environments were presented to participants in a home environment via PC/headphones. In each of 100 randomised trials, participants rated which hearing aid made a target talker easier to understand. Preference data were compared to objective metrics. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty adults with mild to moderately-severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS: The investigational device was preferred to the control hearing aids in 99 out of 100 trials, with one tie. The investigational hearing aid had an average SNR of 12.2 dB (over the unaided condition), compared to between 3.0 and 5.9 dB for the five control hearing aids. CONCLUSIONS: For most clinicians, performance in noise is a top consideration when selecting a hearing device. The consistent preference for the investigational hearing aid suggests that Spatial AI may significantly improve perceived ease of understanding in challenging, multitalker noise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Audiology
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2026.2663345
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial AI consistently preferred to state-of-the-art hearing aids in multitalker noise

Nathan Agmon, B E Weinstein, Igor Lovchinsky, Israel Malkin et al.
International Journal of Audiology
Speech and Audio Processing
article

Spatial AI consistently preferred to state-of-the-art hearing aids in multitalker noise

Nathan Agmon, B E Weinstein, Igor Lovchinsky, Israel Malkin, Mark Berry, Cole Morris, Christina Callahan, Joseph Montano, Kaitlyn Lyngaas, Kathleen Wallace, Bess Nagler
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the Spatial AI model running on the Fortell AI hearing aids to see whether it improves perceived ease of understanding in noisy, multitalker environments relative to hearing aids using more traditional processing. DESIGN: In a blinded, randomised-controlled trial, participants compared the investigational hearing aid to five control hearing aids, representing the latest technology from the five major hearing aid manufacturers. Recordings of the hearing aids in noisy, multitalker environments were presented to participants in a home environment via PC/headphones. In each of 100 randomised trials, participants rated which hearing aid made a target talker easier to understand. Preference data were compared to objective metrics. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty adults with mild to moderately-severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS: The investigational device was preferred to the control hearing aids in 99 out of 100 trials, with one tie. The investigational hearing aid had an average SNR of 12.2 dB (over the unaided condition), compared to between 3.0 and 5.9 dB for the five control hearing aids. CONCLUSIONS: For most clinicians, performance in noise is a top consideration when selecting a hearing device. The consistent preference for the investigational hearing aid suggests that Spatial AI may significantly improve perceived ease of understanding in challenging, multitalker noise.

International Journal of Audiology
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), Cornell University (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Incell Corporation (United States) (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), Shell (Netherlands) (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Speech and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spatial AI consistently preferred to state-of-the-art hearing aids in multitalker noise — Nathan Agmon, B E Weinstein, et al. · International Journal of Audiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS