Hybrid Curriculum Learning for Data-Efficient Lung Nodule Detection with YOLOv11

Background/Objectives: Accurate detection of pulmonary nodules on chest CT is critical for lung cancer screening, yet training robust detectors remains challenging due to the high cost of reliable annotations. In this work, we present a systematic study of curriculum learning for CT-based lung nodule detection on the enhanced LUNA25 benchmark and propose a hybrid curriculum learning framework for data-efficient optimization. Methods: Our approach estimates sample difficulty by fusing clinically interpretable handcrafted factors such as nodule size and count with model-driven signals such as prediction confidence from a teacher model, and constructs a three-stage progressive training curriculum from easy to hard samples. Using YOLOv11s as a strong baseline, the proposed hybrid curriculum is compared against conventional training without curriculum learning and against single-source curricula. Results: On the held-out LUNA25 test set, hybrid curriculum learning increases mAP50 from 0.672 to 0.696, mAP50–95 from 0.369 to 0.385, recall from 0.588 to 0.634, and precision from 0.725 to 0.764. Extensive data-efficiency experiments with proportional reductions (1/2, 1/5, 1/10) and fixed training samples (5000–40,000 slices) further confirm consistent gains across limited-data regimes. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that jointly leveraging intrinsic image complexity and optimization-aware feedback provides effective sample scheduling for robust and data-efficient lung nodule detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16101441
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Curriculum Learning for Data-Efficient Lung Nodule Detection with YOLOv11

Hamed Hooshangnejad, Yi Luo, Yike Guo, Zongwei Zhou et al.
Diagnostics
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Hybrid Curriculum Learning for Data-Efficient Lung Nodule Detection with YOLOv11

Hamed Hooshangnejad, Yi Luo, Yike Guo, Zongwei Zhou, Yipeng Hu, Quan Chen, Yaxi Chen, Feng Xue, Rui Zhang, Kai Ding
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Accurate detection of pulmonary nodules on chest CT is critical for lung cancer screening, yet training robust detectors remains challenging due to the high cost of reliable annotations. In this work, we present a systematic study of curriculum learning for CT-based lung nodule detection on the enhanced LUNA25 benchmark and propose a hybrid curriculum learning framework for data-efficient optimization. Methods: Our approach estimates sample difficulty by fusing clinically interpretable handcrafted factors such as nodule size and count with model-driven signals such as prediction confidence from a teacher model, and constructs a three-stage progressive training curriculum from easy to hard samples. Using YOLOv11s as a strong baseline, the proposed hybrid curriculum is compared against conventional training without curriculum learning and against single-source curricula. Results: On the held-out LUNA25 test set, hybrid curriculum learning increases mAP50 from 0.672 to 0.696, mAP50–95 from 0.369 to 0.385, recall from 0.588 to 0.634, and precision from 0.725 to 0.764. Extensive data-efficiency experiments with proportional reductions (1/2, 1/5, 1/10) and fixed training samples (5000–40,000 slices) further confirm consistent gains across limited-data regimes. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that jointly leveraging intrinsic image complexity and optimization-aware feedback provides effective sample scheduling for robust and data-efficient lung nodule detection.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(10)
University of Minnesota (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), University College London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.