The shape of time: How temporal landmarks influence shape preference

This research investigates how temporal landmarks (such as the beginning or end of a period) influence individuals' preferences for shapes (angular vs. circular). In contrast to prior research that explored shape preferences without specific time reference points (e.g., nostalgia), we examine how temporal cues influence shape preference through explicit time reference points. We conducted three experiments manipulating temporal landmark (start vs. end) across three scenarios: the same time on different days, different times on the same day and the same time on the same day. These experiments also assessed individuals' preferences for angular versus circular shapes in both two- and three-dimensional formats. The results show that individuals at a start temporal landmark prefer angular shapes, whereas those at an end temporal landmark prefer circular shapes, which is mediated by ego depletion. We further found that temporal orientation (present vs. future) moderates the influences of temporal landmarks on individuals' shape preferences. While individuals with present temporal orientation are consistent with the main effect, individuals with future temporal orientation have an opposite behaviour (individuals at a start temporal landmark prefer circular shapes, whereas those at an end temporal landmark prefer angular shapes).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Psychology
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70082
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The shape of time: How temporal landmarks influence shape preference

Lixiao Geng, X Chen, Yizheng Zhou, Huijie Zhu et al.
British Journal of Psychology
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

The shape of time: How temporal landmarks influence shape preference

Lixiao Geng, X Chen, Yizheng Zhou, Huijie Zhu, Wenrong Chen, Shichang Liang
article en

Abstract

This research investigates how temporal landmarks (such as the beginning or end of a period) influence individuals' preferences for shapes (angular vs. circular). In contrast to prior research that explored shape preferences without specific time reference points (e.g., nostalgia), we examine how temporal cues influence shape preference through explicit time reference points. We conducted three experiments manipulating temporal landmark (start vs. end) across three scenarios: the same time on different days, different times on the same day and the same time on the same day. These experiments also assessed individuals' preferences for angular versus circular shapes in both two- and three-dimensional formats. The results show that individuals at a start temporal landmark prefer angular shapes, whereas those at an end temporal landmark prefer circular shapes, which is mediated by ego depletion. We further found that temporal orientation (present vs. future) moderates the influences of temporal landmarks on individuals' shape preferences. While individuals with present temporal orientation are consistent with the main effect, individuals with future temporal orientation have an opposite behaviour (individuals at a start temporal landmark prefer circular shapes, whereas those at an end temporal landmark prefer angular shapes).

British Journal of Psychology
Guangxi University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The shape of time: How temporal landmarks influence shape preference — Lixiao Geng, X Chen, et al. · British Journal of Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS