Comparison between Localized Skin-Friction Reduction and Suction on a Supercritical Airfoil

Abstract In this work, direct numerical simulations are used to investigate which physical effects of active flow control are most relevant for improving the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. To this end, two active flow control strategies based on inherently different physical mechanisms are systematically compared on the upper surface of the supercritical V2C airfoil in compressible transonic flow. The first strategy consists of streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity (StTW), a skin-friction drag reduction technique that locally decreases wall shear stress in the region of application. The second strategy is uniform wall-normal suction, which locally increases skin-friction drag. One strength of the present study is that the control configurations are evaluated at matched lift coefficients to isolate the impact of the control mechanisms on drag components, boundary-layer development, shock position, and energetic cost. Despite their opposite local effects on skin-friction drag, both control strategies yield comparable and significant improvements in global aerodynamic efficiency. The analysis reveals that, for both approaches, the dominant mechanism responsible for the efficiency increase is a downstream displacement of the shock, accompanied by a reduction in boundary-layer momentum thickness. These results highlight the central role of shock–boundary-layer interaction control in enhancing transonic aerodynamic performance and demonstrate that skin-friction drag reduction alone is not a sufficient metric for assessing the effectiveness of active flow control strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Flow Turbulence and Combustion
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-026-00748-w
Primary Topic
Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between Localized Skin-Friction Reduction and Suction on a Supercritical Airfoil

Annika Frede, Giulio Soldati, Niccolò Berizzi, Maurizio Quadrio et al.
Flow Turbulence and Combustion
Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
article

Comparison between Localized Skin-Friction Reduction and Suction on a Supercritical Airfoil

Annika Frede, Giulio Soldati, Niccolò Berizzi, Maurizio Quadrio, Davide Gatti, Sergio Pirozzoli
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this work, direct numerical simulations are used to investigate which physical effects of active flow control are most relevant for improving the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. To this end, two active flow control strategies based on inherently different physical mechanisms are systematically compared on the upper surface of the supercritical V2C airfoil in compressible transonic flow. The first strategy consists of streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity (StTW), a skin-friction drag reduction technique that locally decreases wall shear stress in the region of application. The second strategy is uniform wall-normal suction, which locally increases skin-friction drag. One strength of the present study is that the control configurations are evaluated at matched lift coefficients to isolate the impact of the control mechanisms on drag components, boundary-layer development, shock position, and energetic cost. Despite their opposite local effects on skin-friction drag, both control strategies yield comparable and significant improvements in global aerodynamic efficiency. The analysis reveals that, for both approaches, the dominant mechanism responsible for the efficiency increase is a downstream displacement of the shock, accompanied by a reduction in boundary-layer momentum thickness. These results highlight the central role of shock–boundary-layer interaction control in enhancing transonic aerodynamic performance and demonstrate that skin-friction drag reduction alone is not a sufficient metric for assessing the effectiveness of active flow control strategies.

Flow Turbulence and CombustionVol. 116(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.