The Effort-Reward Mismatch: Cognitive Friction and the Conditions of Possibility

Frictionless, dematerialised environments (FDEs) are producing a paradox: a rise in cognitive exhaustion and somatic discomfort even as information environments become objectively more efficient. This editorial argues the progressive removal of material, bodily, and social resistance from knowledge environments does not expand cognitive possibility; it forecloses the conditions under which understanding has historically been assembled. What distinguishes the current moment is not merely the pace of change but the nature of the niche: for the first time, the dominant cognitive environment is genuinely immaterial and acquiescent, aligned with the Cartesian fantasy of mind liberated from body rather than with the embodied, situated reality of human cognition. It introduces the concept of the cognitive uncanny valley to account for the somatic discomfort that accompanies AI-generated knowledge. The editorial concludes with a call not for greater cognitive efficiency but for its opposite: the deliberate preservation of inefficiency, impasse, and not-knowing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Possibility Studies & Society
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699261446143
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effort-Reward Mismatch: Cognitive Friction and the Conditions of Possibility

Wendy Ross
Possibility Studies & Society
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

The Effort-Reward Mismatch: Cognitive Friction and the Conditions of Possibility

Wendy Ross
article en

Abstract

Frictionless, dematerialised environments (FDEs) are producing a paradox: a rise in cognitive exhaustion and somatic discomfort even as information environments become objectively more efficient. This editorial argues the progressive removal of material, bodily, and social resistance from knowledge environments does not expand cognitive possibility; it forecloses the conditions under which understanding has historically been assembled. What distinguishes the current moment is not merely the pace of change but the nature of the niche: for the first time, the dominant cognitive environment is genuinely immaterial and acquiescent, aligned with the Cartesian fantasy of mind liberated from body rather than with the embodied, situated reality of human cognition. It introduces the concept of the cognitive uncanny valley to account for the somatic discomfort that accompanies AI-generated knowledge. The editorial concludes with a call not for greater cognitive efficiency but for its opposite: the deliberate preservation of inefficiency, impasse, and not-knowing.

Possibility Studies & Society
London Metropolitan University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.