Effect of body positions on outcomes of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation

Abstract Background Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicits motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and assesses motor cortex and corticospinal tract physiology. Various factors influence MEPs. This study aimed to compare TMS findings between sitting and supine positions. Methods Single-pulse TMS was applied to 20 healthy individuals (12 males, 8 females) in both sitting and supine positions using a round coil. MEPs were recorded from the abductor digiti quinti and tibialis anterior muscles. Resting motor threshold (RMT), active motor threshold (AMT), MEP amplitude and latency, central motor conduction time (CMCT), and cortical silent period (CSP) were compared between the two positions. Results The mean RMT/AMT for the right upper extremity were 44.10 ± 9.00%/34.90 ± 7.09% in the sitting position and 50.09 ± 8.76%/39.70 ± 7.81% in the supine position, respectively ( p < 0.001 for RMT, p = 0.003 for AMT). For the right lower extremity, the mean RMT/AMT were 61.55 ± 10.77%/45.00 ± 10.72% in the sitting position and 68.70 ± 10.55%/52.75 ± 9.89% in the supine position, respectively ( p < 0.001 for RMT and AMT). MEP latency and amplitude, CMCT, and CSP did not show any significant differences between positions. Conclusions The sitting position may be preferable for routine TMS, as lower motor thresholds allow the use of lower stimulation intensities and may improve tolerability. However, as MEP findings were similar between the two positions, TMS can be applied in the supine position for patients at risk of seizures or syncope to prevent syncope or seizure-related complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-026-01178-1
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of body positions on outcomes of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation

Metin Balduz, Mehmet YILDIZ, Cemre Cöddü, İrem Yakıcı et al.
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Effect of body positions on outcomes of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation

Metin Balduz, Mehmet YILDIZ, Cemre Cöddü, İrem Yakıcı, Halit Fidancı, Halil Can Alaydın
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicits motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and assesses motor cortex and corticospinal tract physiology. Various factors influence MEPs. This study aimed to compare TMS findings between sitting and supine positions. Methods Single-pulse TMS was applied to 20 healthy individuals (12 males, 8 females) in both sitting and supine positions using a round coil. MEPs were recorded from the abductor digiti quinti and tibialis anterior muscles. Resting motor threshold (RMT), active motor threshold (AMT), MEP amplitude and latency, central motor conduction time (CMCT), and cortical silent period (CSP) were compared between the two positions. Results The mean RMT/AMT for the right upper extremity were 44.10 ± 9.00%/34.90 ± 7.09% in the sitting position and 50.09 ± 8.76%/39.70 ± 7.81% in the supine position, respectively ( p < 0.001 for RMT, p = 0.003 for AMT). For the right lower extremity, the mean RMT/AMT were 61.55 ± 10.77%/45.00 ± 10.72% in the sitting position and 68.70 ± 10.55%/52.75 ± 9.89% in the supine position, respectively ( p < 0.001 for RMT and AMT). MEP latency and amplitude, CMCT, and CSP did not show any significant differences between positions. Conclusions The sitting position may be preferable for routine TMS, as lower motor thresholds allow the use of lower stimulation intensities and may improve tolerability. However, as MEP findings were similar between the two positions, TMS can be applied in the supine position for patients at risk of seizures or syncope to prevent syncope or seizure-related complications.

The Egyptian Journal of Neurology Psychiatry and NeurosurgeryVol. 62(1)
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.