Outcomes of endocardial versus endo-epicardial catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmia in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a meta analysis

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is typically performed using an endocardial first approach. However, epicardial involvement is common and recurrence remains frequent. We therefore compared the pooled efficacy and safety of endocardial-only versus combined endocardial and epicardial ablation strategies. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of studies comparing endocardial and endo-epicardial VT ablation in patients with ARVC, including single- and double-arm designs. Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) recurrence was the primary endpoint and major complications were secondary. Bayesian methods were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs), with posterior predictive checks assessing model fit. A frequentist random-effects meta-analysis of double-arm studies was also conducted. Individual patient data (IPD) reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves enabled pooled survival analyses and hazard ratio (HR) estimation for VA recurrence. RESULTS: Seventeen studies including 976 patients reporting primary or secondary outcomes were analyzed. Endo-epicardial ablation in ARVC was associated with a significantly lower risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) recurrence (Bayesian OR 0.47, 95% CrI 0.34-0.64), with similar frequentist analysis results (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.75, p = 0.001). Reconstructed IPD from 460 patients showed reduced VA recurrence (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.28-0.52; log-rank p < 0.001). Across 15 studies (866 patients), the combined approach increased complication risk (Bayesian OR 6.28, 95% CI 2-24). The frequentist model demonstrated a comparable increase (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.02-10, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Endo-epicardial ablation reduced VA recurrence but increased major complication risk compared with endocardial ablation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-026-02348-0
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of endocardial versus endo-epicardial catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmia in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a meta analysis

Eisha Gupta, Sawai Singh Rathore, Jacqueline Mirza, A Y Yadav et al.
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
article

Outcomes of endocardial versus endo-epicardial catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmia in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a meta analysis

Eisha Gupta, Sawai Singh Rathore, Jacqueline Mirza, A Y Yadav, E Kevin Heist, Mohamed Ashraf Ahmed, Akshat Banga, Abhishek Maan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is typically performed using an endocardial first approach. However, epicardial involvement is common and recurrence remains frequent. We therefore compared the pooled efficacy and safety of endocardial-only versus combined endocardial and epicardial ablation strategies. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of studies comparing endocardial and endo-epicardial VT ablation in patients with ARVC, including single- and double-arm designs. Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) recurrence was the primary endpoint and major complications were secondary. Bayesian methods were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs), with posterior predictive checks assessing model fit. A frequentist random-effects meta-analysis of double-arm studies was also conducted. Individual patient data (IPD) reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves enabled pooled survival analyses and hazard ratio (HR) estimation for VA recurrence. RESULTS: Seventeen studies including 976 patients reporting primary or secondary outcomes were analyzed. Endo-epicardial ablation in ARVC was associated with a significantly lower risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) recurrence (Bayesian OR 0.47, 95% CrI 0.34-0.64), with similar frequentist analysis results (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.75, p = 0.001). Reconstructed IPD from 460 patients showed reduced VA recurrence (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.28-0.52; log-rank p < 0.001). Across 15 studies (866 patients), the combined approach increased complication risk (Bayesian OR 6.28, 95% CI 2-24). The frequentist model demonstrated a comparable increase (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.02-10, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Endo-epicardial ablation reduced VA recurrence but increased major complication risk compared with endocardial ablation.

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Mount Auburn Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Staten Island University Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), St. Vincent Hospital (US), University of Toledo (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.