Does private interaction influence ESG rating divergence? Evidence from corporate site visits in China

Purpose This study examines whether investor-management interactions during corporate site visits in China help reduce ESG rating divergence. Building on prior research that identifies information asymmetry as a key driver of ESG rating divergence, we investigate whether voluntary disclosure in an interactive setting improves the subsequent consistency of ESG assessments. In particular, we focus on whether ESG-related attention during corporate site visits influences ESG rating divergence and through what mechanisms. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of A-share firms listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, we match corporate site visits from 2012 to 2021 with ESG rating divergence in the following year from 2013 to 2022. ESG attention is measured through textual analysis of Q&A transcripts using a Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic model. ESG rating divergence is measured as the standard deviation of standardized ESG ratings issued by six major rating agencies. To test our hypotheses, we estimate OLS regressions with firm and year fixed effects. Findings We find that greater ESG attention during corporate site visits significantly reduces subsequent ESG rating divergence. This effect operates through two channels: improved information disclosure quality and increased media coverage. In addition, the mitigating effect is more pronounced when management responses are more positive, when firms use more euphemistic language, and when firms operate in environmentally sensitive industries. Originality/value Our findings identify private investor–management interactions during corporate site visits as an important factor shaping ESG rating divergence. This study contributes to the literature on ESG ratings and voluntary disclosure by showing that corporate site visits can reduce information asymmetry and improve the consistency of ESG evaluations. The findings also offer practical implications for managers, investors, and regulators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial Finance
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-09-2025-0720
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does private interaction influence ESG rating divergence? Evidence from corporate site visits in China

Songlian Tang, Yuxuan Pang, Kaihui Shu
Managerial Finance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Does private interaction influence ESG rating divergence? Evidence from corporate site visits in China

Songlian Tang, Yuxuan Pang, Kaihui Shu
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines whether investor-management interactions during corporate site visits in China help reduce ESG rating divergence. Building on prior research that identifies information asymmetry as a key driver of ESG rating divergence, we investigate whether voluntary disclosure in an interactive setting improves the subsequent consistency of ESG assessments. In particular, we focus on whether ESG-related attention during corporate site visits influences ESG rating divergence and through what mechanisms. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of A-share firms listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, we match corporate site visits from 2012 to 2021 with ESG rating divergence in the following year from 2013 to 2022. ESG attention is measured through textual analysis of Q&A transcripts using a Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic model. ESG rating divergence is measured as the standard deviation of standardized ESG ratings issued by six major rating agencies. To test our hypotheses, we estimate OLS regressions with firm and year fixed effects. Findings We find that greater ESG attention during corporate site visits significantly reduces subsequent ESG rating divergence. This effect operates through two channels: improved information disclosure quality and increased media coverage. In addition, the mitigating effect is more pronounced when management responses are more positive, when firms use more euphemistic language, and when firms operate in environmentally sensitive industries. Originality/value Our findings identify private investor–management interactions during corporate site visits as an important factor shaping ESG rating divergence. This study contributes to the literature on ESG ratings and voluntary disclosure by showing that corporate site visits can reduce information asymmetry and improve the consistency of ESG evaluations. The findings also offer practical implications for managers, investors, and regulators.

Managerial Finance
Donghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.